The debate "90's music is way better than todays music" was started by
November 18, 2015, 6:39 pm.
20 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 7 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
DannyknowsItAll posted 1 argument, Apollo8 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
MylifeisaJoke posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
DannyknowsItAll, liberalssuck, Alex, invincible_01, Apollo8, AstroSpace, josevazquez244, TonganCaillou, truth_or_ture, TheControversy, Neelza, PrincessTia18 and 8 visitors agree.
MylifeisaJoke, scotthansonMC, Picassota, omgflyingbannas and 3 visitors disagree.
This is highly subjective based on your preference. I myself like the previous generations' music better than this one's. But I don't know what you think.
adele got good music but im talking about an overall
AIthough I agree that many singers who work for the studio company are getting refrained from doing their own music and have fewer control on what they sing. You should know that in the 60s, people dislike Elvis Presley's music and in the 50s, same about The Beatles. Different eras develop different music. If you suggest music is bad without specify the reason, it seems to me you have not diven in the music ocean long enough. Personally speaking, Adele, Josh Stone, Michael Buble are a few of people who sing good music well. Sometimes you just need to explore more and learn to accept the fact that there is no better music, only different music.
80's were pretty good too.