The debate "911 was an inside job" was started by
May 11, 2019, 4:41 pm.
18 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 13 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
MagicMicah posted 1 argument, InfinityMachine posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
historybuff posted 2 arguments, Nemiroff posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
hhh2000, LucyTheDebatorQueen, MADHURA, MagicMicah, InfinityMachine, Willyis, lukeluckynuke123, Jonk92, YEET and 9 visitors agree.
historybuff, amir_alhakim07 and 11 visitors disagree.
yeah. The Prez is probably more to blame If were talking who let it Happen.
that is a possibility, kinda like pearl harbor.
although if anyone has Intel on an international attack, it wouldn't be the Gov, but the Prez
Well I some what believe. but I think the Gov just let it happen.
Yet it takes over 1000 degrees to melt metal. But your telling me metal can melt easy?
Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F and at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent.
If your bones lost 50% of their strength then you would almost certainly snap a leg doing normal activities. if the structure holding up a building loses 50% of it's strength, it collapses. There is nothing unusual about that.
so the not hot enough to melt claim...
you dont need to fully liquify metal to weaken it.
Ever heard of AE911 Truth?
I have never seen any evidence at all for this argument that I found credible or compelling. Please lay out what facts you feel back this statement up?
the facts clearly show it was