A driver should have a consequence for hitting a deer walking in the street

June 23, 2019, 12:39 am

Agree8 Disagree8

50%
50%

The debate "A driver should have a consequence for hitting a deer walking in the street" was started by babymarie on June 23, 2019, 12:39 am. 8 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 8 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. There is a tie in this debate, post your arguments, call some reinforcements and break this tie.

boispendaddy posted 1 argument, JDAWG9693 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.

babymarie, sssk, TPSYT1 and 5 visitors agree.
JDAWG9693, boispendaddy, hollieg, fireball4thewin, MrStealyogrill, Deat and 2 visitors disagree.

Also, I've had a deer literally jump into my car and kill itself; this is not uncommon. Should I be convicted because the deer committed suicide?

3 weeks, 3 days ago

In nearly all situations, hitting a deer in the street is accidental and could cause damage to your vehicle. Hitting a deer can be caused by slow reaction time, car's inability to break or swerve effectively, or not seeing the deer. In a court of law, convicting someone for hitting a deer is a massive headache and also a waste of time. In the end, natural selection is what killed the deer, not the driver.

3 weeks, 3 days ago
Discuss "A driver should have a consequence for hitting a deer walking in the street " pets
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.