A driver should have a consequence for hitting a deer walking in the street

June 23, 2019, 12:39 am

Agree10 Disagree12

45%
55%

The debate "A driver should have a consequence for hitting a deer walking in the street" was started by babymarie on June 23, 2019, 12:39 am. 10 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 12 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most people are against to this statement.

boispendaddy posted 1 argument, JDAWG9693 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.

babymarie, sssk, TPSYT1 and 7 visitors agree.
JDAWG9693, boispendaddy, hollieg, fireball4thewin, MrStealyogrill, Deat, Dreezy and 5 visitors disagree.

Also, I've had a deer literally jump into my car and kill itself; this is not uncommon. Should I be convicted because the deer committed suicide?

4 months ago

In nearly all situations, hitting a deer in the street is accidental and could cause damage to your vehicle. Hitting a deer can be caused by slow reaction time, car's inability to break or swerve effectively, or not seeing the deer. In a court of law, convicting someone for hitting a deer is a massive headache and also a waste of time. In the end, natural selection is what killed the deer, not the driver.

4 months ago
Discuss "A driver should have a consequence for hitting a deer walking in the street " pets
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.