The debate "A victim should not be blamed no matter the situation for someone raping them" was started by
April 5, 2015, 3:46 am.
31 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 7 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
PsychDave posted 3 arguments, pie_goddess499 posted 1 argument, Getmurked posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
teebee7 posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
Fountaine550, ufufugh, tr, Bodaciouslady16, PsychDave, keepscrolling, animegirlxx, Jimmy_123, pie_goddess499, Getmurked, Realtalker, invincible_01, Untamed, LondonLeaders, transfanboy, pretty_twin, sighnomore99, Trance and 13 visitors agree.
teebee7, ABDO and 5 visitors disagree.
your argument is utterly flawed it seems hopeless to even address it. are you actually compraing an inanimate object to a real, caniving, evil gluttonous person? they didnt fall into thier arms, they were purposwly beaten or drugges ans then raped through no fault of thier own. even if someone actually walked down an alley or whattever your scenario is, THEY DONT DESERVE TO BE RAPED. that is not thier fault for trying to live thier life
So you are saying that of someone is raped it is their own fault for walking down the street, or for having someone break into their house, or for being drugged. I don't understand how anyone could say that playing somewhere dangerous is equivalent to being attacked. By your logic, mugging victims are completely at fault for carrying a wallet and murder victims are to blame for putting themselves in a situation where they could be killed. We should all lock ourselves in our rooms and slowly starved to death to avoid anyone being able hurts because, if you are in public and attacked, it is your own fault.
look at it like this. if a person plays on the other side of a fence where there is a massive grinder and falls in, is it the grinders fault the person have gotten grinded up?
what kind of argument is that? who would say that? if it ever even happens its a joke, and should not be taken seriously. if it was, then thags all the rapisrs fault for even thinking of doing that, let alone not understandinf a joke. the fact of the matter is that has never been said, or will.
How often in all of history have you seem anything to show that someone said something like that? You are creating a situation that most likely has never happened and most likely will never happened and holding it up as a banner for how rapists are all right by you. Look up the definition of a straw man argument.
I agree it is not their fault say someone did tell a rapist that they can't take someones virginity and puts a price on it, it is still wrong you should have the mental capacity to know what you are doing is wrong and if can fall into pier pressure that easily for something that wrong then you need to seek mental help if the devil needs permission to enter someones body then so do you
so if they tell a rapist "i bet you my virginity and 100$ you cant rape me" then is it not their fault at all if they happen to find themself in that position?
The only possible exception I can imagine is the case where someone has regrets after the fact and claims they were raped rather than admit it was consensual, but that would be very rare and I wouldn't really consider them a victim.