The debate "All Rapist Should Be Castrated and Have Their Prostates Removed" was started by
July 17, 2019, 8:20 pm.
19 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 20 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
TRUELOVE posted 1 argument, Light posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Light posted 1 argument, Allirix posted 1 argument, mwest0097 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
TRUELOVE, sk25, YEET, Unaluhabe and 15 visitors agree.
Allirix, Light, mwest0097, A, Steelheart, Manuel, codyray16 and 13 visitors disagree.
I think chemical castration for repeat offenders is warranted if they have shown they are not willing or able to be rehabilitated. I don't think it's a good idea for first offences because of the probability of false conviction. Castrating a man only to find out later that he was falsely accused and innocent would be a tragedy and incredibly unjust.
mind if I ask what branch of Christianity you follow TRUELOVE because you are more extreme and literal than any Christian I've met.
I think any permanent damage done to someone as a punishment ignores the concept of rehabilitation. Bad people can change
Castration =/= death
They should be put to death. Castration for a man is DEATH! ??????
What about female rapists?
I think that removing the prostate is extreme, but I'm okay with castration for higher degrees of rape if you can 100% prove they did it. Not beyond a reasonable doubt; beyond any doubt.
What is your reasoning