The debate "Animal testing should be banned" was started by
January 26, 2019, 11:21 am.
By the way, masterdebater_312 is disagreeing with this statement.
44 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 57 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
District9 posted 1 argument, district10 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
JDAWG9693 posted 3 arguments to the disagreers part.
MajorGeneralX, District9, InfinityMachine, district10, tmjcb99, akahazel, Mashung, SanjayKumar, amir_alhakim07 and 35 visitors agree.
masterdebater_312, Kronicle, JDAWG9693, Dmoderate32, lucky, Debate_Wonder, nativeRepublican, Brynn, seefus, TD, mzidanr, finthechat, AryaLp1, cringyuh, OUTSMARTED, HelloWorLd, rainingdown, jrardin12, devinmungo and 38 visitors disagree.
I don't think performing test on animals are bad. Unless you are unsure about the outcome of event that may occur, then i would not want that for any other animal. Unless they can guarantee it won't be hurt.
Can you give prominent examples?
And, I'm sure that there are, but the animal testing still aids us in figuring out how to make it work for people
There are a lot of drugs which pass animal tests but fail in humans
though testing animals is useless
What part of animal testing is wrong? I believe that testing on animals, possibly harming them, especially if it's to further a product, is okay
Why is it not okay?
@JDAWG humans of course, the selfish bastards who created the product
Unless it is strictly an animal product, I think it is wrong, people are making these incentions and therefor should be the ones to sacrifice for theirbown inventions. It's cruel and selfish to force an animal to be tested when you don't have the slightest idea of the side effects
I test animals....
What is a good alternative? And, why should it be banned?