The debate "Boosting mid/low income will boost spending economy far more than helping already high profit corps" was started by
December 26, 2017, 7:44 am.
By the way, Nemiroff is disagreeing with this statement.
49 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 10 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Nemiroff posted 5 arguments, neveralone posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Kulu, Brynn, ttsacin2, Masonearl, Austynbb, MetalClaw99, kidkck, bernie2020, neveralone, Andrewchaney69420, Drakgo, Harmony, amazestep18, AerichJ, SUPERPIGGU and 34 visitors agree.
chasediedrich1, UnleashedPatriotism, Nemiroff and 7 visitors disagree.
I agree. Demand drives the economy #KeynesianEconomics #consumerism
which is where Republicans (us) are definitely wrong.
if there is universal agreement, why did everyone on the right support the damned tax bill? it did the exact opposite!
and the spending from low/mid income families will inevitably, 100% trickle to the top... while acquiring commodities and services up and down the economy.
while giving to the top pay trickle down in investments *OR* may just go to Swiss savings accounts as you said or corporate stock buy backs that create nothing for the broader economy. we will have to have faith in the kindness of cut throat capitalists as opposed to a gauranteed win with trickle up economics.
Low and middle income families spend money inside their own economy. the rich tend to hide it in a bank in Switzerland, or buy their 3rd yacht made in the netherlands or italy.
do republicans really not care about anything except for social issues?