The debate "Carjackers are smarter than police because they only jack people who aren't driving police cars" was started by
an anonymous person on
June 3, 2017, 10:37 pm.
4 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 14 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Najam1 posted 10 arguments to the agreers part.
4 visitors agree.
Etabob, ProfDoke and 12 visitors disagree.
lmfao najam deleted his name from the post. little did he know, everybody knows that such a stupid debate could only be created and worded in that way by him! you cant hide najam!
1.78 deaths per second; 107 deaths per minute; 6,390 deaths per hour; 153,000 deaths per ... however, the fact remains that people are dying all around us.
That still has nothing to do with carjackers or police. I'm done addressing your inane prattle here.
You should be arguing about burning in hell with your homosexual sodomites.
It will be too late to rectify your atrocious conduct post death.
So no argument. Good to know.
You and your homosexual sodomites are going to burn in hell.
When have I advocated "homosexual sodomy?"
Simple enough or are you going to equivocate again?
You are lying and replacing words as usual.
Happy sex is a different term, and has nothing to do with your felons who regularly participate in homosexual sodomy, both inside and outside the prisons.
Soon your scheme will unravel, and Allah will call you all things much worse than felons.
When did I advocate gay sex?
You are an advocate of homosexual sodomy. Its a felony even if you are going to hell after you die instead of jail while alive. Satan pays police to not arrest you, he pays them to lie and say you aren't the biggest felons on the planet.
So now you think I am a cop? Could you keep your imaginary world consistent?
You having sex with another man is the evil crime you are going to hell for, nobody is going to hell for beating up a cop whose armed with both a pistol and a nightstick, even a taser.
You are a stupid fool who deserves to go to hell with all the police you pay to protect your anal sodomy with other men. That's why you all commit suicide instead of going to jail, once someone catches you.
So in your mind two people having consensual sex is wrong, but beating an innocent person is not? You even included "beating up an innocent armed cop" so you can't claim that the cop did something to warrant a violent response. What is wrong with you?
Nope. You are simply wrong.
Felony does not mean an evil act, it means a serious act that is against the law. Your religious beliefs do not determine the law, therefore you are mistaken. Complain all you would like, but saying others can't do something because it is against YOUR religion makes you a tyrant. A small, pitiful, powerless tyrant.
And felonies, whether they are selling drugs or assaulting a police officer, can be sealed or expunged depending on where you live and how you behave after you have served your sentence. Maybe you just haven't behaved well enough to have your record expunged.
The homosexual sodomy is the felony because two or more agreed, whilst beating up an innocent armed cop is never by agreement.
Basically, if a person says they are a felon, you should expect them to do something evil.
By labeling a person who committed an act of evil as a permanent felon, you lose.
The person can never be forgiven because police are paid to make sure they aren't, especially if the one has already murdered one or more people.
Homosexual sodomy is the felonious activity.
Your allies reversed the logic, thus the chaos of that being a forgiveable felony alongside heroin and prostitution.
The one using and selling speedballs or MDMA can have his felony forgiven, whilst the one who knocks the overseeing cop down must suffer with the label of evil one for life.
A felony means extremely evil act.
I'm not sure where you get your information, but you should really double check it.
Felony does not mean evil.
You have also effectively debunked your own argument. If someone can slap a police officer without being a felon, you are wrong. Since you've provided an example os someone doing so, your argument about how corrupt and intolerant the law is falls apart. Thank you.
Finally, why are you so obsessed with gay people and sodomy? We are discussing police and carjackers, and you want to talk about gay sex. Why is it that you always consider gay sex to be at the root of people's decisions?
Felony means evil. Even so, police are not actually gods. Zsa Zsa Gabor slapped one of them, but she didn't do so in Illinois. I am telling you that in Illinois, police are treated as false gods.
Simply because so many men in Illinois are participants of homosexual sodomy, they permit one to be labeled as an evil unforgivable felon based upon one combatting an armed cop until the person dies and goes into heaven. The homosexual sodomites designed it that way to protect their actual felony sodomy, as Satan is the one paying the cops
No matter how much you whine, you are wrong.
Taking the gun from the hip of a police and then killing him with it qualifies to be a felony instead of a fist fight with a cop.
Anyone who is paid to agree that if they are pushed or slapped it becomes a felony is a felon themself, unless the cop is blind, unarmed, or 90 years old
Homosexual sodomy is the evil action.
Your advocacy and alliance with Satan permits you to say pushing a cop is an evil act that's unforgivable until the person dies.
Pushing a cop can only be a felony if one was to push an innocent police from behind in front of an incoming train.
Felony means an extreme evil act.
You put the power to define felonious acts in the hands of actual felons. Its rigged so that neither they or their cop bodyguards can be labeled felonious enemies of all people until they die and go to hell.
They made even homosexual prostitution a forgiveable offense, whereas pushing a cop, or even slapping a cop is not a forgiveable act until the person dies.
Thus police are made into false gods without even knowing it.
Pushing someone is considered assault. Yes, assaulting someone is a crime. Are you saying that you should be free to physically attack police officers without consequences?
And you are mistaken. There are methods of removing a conviction from your record. If you are having trouble due to your record you should look into them.
You are the one allied with criminals who pretend to be the people going to heaven. Pushing a cop is considered such an evil crime that your allies are paid to permanently call such a person a felon. Your allies never forgive being so much as pushed, one has to sit around and watch you die one by one; so you can be the ones who don't get forgiven, and have to go live in hell forever and ever.
I'll take that as a concession of this debate as you have completely given up on defending your position.
Good luck in life if this is your approach to disagreement.
Soon, you won't be able to lie about who you are and what you have done with your time on the Earth besides worshipping police as your god.
A man who has raped children is barred from schools, parks, and other education environments. Such a man has every reason to lie about his identity and demonize me.
You cant have friends or a book, so you hate me so much you try to steal my accomplishments and replace them with yours.
You worship police, I worship Allah.
And you are not smart enough to address the topic rather than trying to attack me. If you have no arguments, just concede graciously. Don't prolong your embarrassment with the personal attacks based on your imaginary profile of me.
They are smart enough to know that you have never drove or owned a car worth jacking.
Your ability to jump to ridiculous conclusions never stops being amusing, though it is kind of sad.
Are you ever going to address the topic of the debate and explain how carjackers are smarter than police?
If you are ever fortunate enough to live long enough to actually own/drive a nice Mercedes or Maserati,
perhaps you will lose your foolish stupidity and even naivete to what types of cars the carjackers are allowed to drive, and even the brands of the false god police you worship so fanatically.
You life must be so miserable if this is how you deal with people not immediately agreeing with you.
I own a car. It's not really anything fancy, but it get me to and from work. That isn't really relevant to the topic, but since you seem to obsess over getting some details of my life, hopefully that satisfies you for a while.
Police sieze property involved in crimes. If you are driving drunk, they take your car. If you are transporting drugs, they take your car. If you are doing illegal things, the police stop you. That is their job. You then have to pay the penalty for your actions. I'm not sure where that concept gets mixed up for you, but every society has had police and court systems. Sharia law sets out penalties for crimes. Do you believe the people implementing it are evil, corrupt false gods?
You don't own a car for a police to jack or even a regular car jacker to take. You only own a computer, and your little mouse hole. At least police only take the cars so you can buy them back from them. Regular carjackers are well connected with chop shops, so they get more money for taking cars from the owners than police do.
Also, I have never felt afraid I was going to be carjacked. I have been stopped for ride checks occasionally when the police are checking for drunk drivers, and never felt I needed to be afraid of them. I recognize that this is not true for some people due to institutionalized racism, but you attitude of lashing out and insulting people has probably contributed to your negative interactions with police.
You still haven't explained why, if neither police or carjackers attack those in police cars, it is evidence one is smarter than the other. Could you try addressing the debate, not simply hiding behind ad hominem attacks?
I do drive, but good try. Next time, use facts and evidence. Don't just imagine a situation that gives you an argument and pretend it is real.
I didnt concede the debate, I merely nullified your argument based off your cowardice. You hide from carjackers by not driving a car you own.
I see you have once again conceded the debate and are just insulting me. I am tired of your constant pleas for attention and begging for my information, so I'm going to ignore you here unless you have something relevant or interesting to say.
Dave only says what he says because he is safe from all carjackers whether they are police or not, while hiding in his mousehole.
You realize that you are arguing against something no one is arguing for, right? You are literally just arguing with yourself.
You said carjackers only attack those not in police cars.
Neveralone asked what kind of idiot would steal from someone they knew had a gun and was trained to use it (ie police in a police car).
You then started arguing in favor of small pistols and for some reason brought up gun licensing.
If you are having trouble understanding a point, ask. Don't just argue against random things no one has said.
and how can you prove that all carjackers have an understanding which dictates that:
everyone who owns a tiny pistol has paid police and have their direct permission to own and wield it?
What exactly is going on in your brain that you got that from my argument?
It is not discrimination. It is a lack of suicidal impulses.
what idiot would steal from someone who they know has a gone and is trained in it?
We are talking about how carjackers discriminate and only attack those who are not in police cars.
Specifically talking about a basic carjacker who doesnt pay taxes.
You are the one in love with police and try so hard to defend them because you hide so well, and probably don't own a car for them to jack.
You may want to abandon this topic and redo one that is less grammatically flawed. If police do not Jack those drive police cars, how does car jackets not doing so show that they are smarter?
Police don't jack other police, thin blue line. Police are known to marry other police and kill the spouse; or someone victimized by police kills the child of a police couple.
So is that a yes, you believe police jack other police officers if they are jealous of them?
Police jack anyone they are jealous of, because some people don't have to be police just to survive.
The implication here is that police "jack" people who are driving police cars, which seems patently absurd.