The debate "Carjackers think they are winning if they allow police to take a car they never even bought" was started by
February 6, 2018, 4:28 pm.
3 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 1 person is on the disagree side.
There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Najam1 posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
Najam1 and 2 visitors agree.
you have to add dynamics to your own character. You have to realize that by providing an opposing viewpoint in a scenario doesn't equate to it's advocacy. Rather it adds an extra element. In this case, I am saying that only those who buy cars are vulnerable to both parties that are more interested in taking someone else's car rather than driving along in their own. Both groups trying to take a car from someone else have figured out how to do so as police or as private carjackers. The situation coming out in the media with the Baltimore PD shows how they are able to exploit the population of money, cars, jewelry and anything else they can find.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here? Do I actually agree with you on something, Najam?
Normal people actually have to buy a car, and don't use such a car to assist in carjacking a neighbor