The debate "Child artists are a kind of child labour" was started by
November 13, 2016, 5:26 am.
10 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 21 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Radhikadhawan posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Nemiroff posted 3 arguments, SalonY posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Radhikadhawan, shomar09, monikofos, harshita, Rajat, Grizzi and 4 visitors agree.
Nemiroff, thereal, matt_herricane, neveralone, harley_quinn123, Your_dad, Suco_169, SalonY, AGustafson and 12 visitors disagree.
Noway FrnZ,Its just a way to Figure out their hidden talent...& encourage them
same thing. if the kid isn't coerced or forced, it's fine. if he is, it's not.
Artist means actor
playing golf may not be seen as child labor, but what tiger Woods father supposedly did to him was forced labor.
art can have very different meanings.... and anything can be labor if it is forced on children. if the child wants to draw without being coerced, it's not labor.