The debate "Citizenship amendment act 2019 is unconstitutional." was started by
December 29, 2019, 8:01 am.
16 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 19 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Juwilson posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Allirix, Nemiroff, Juwilson, Huzaifa and 12 visitors agree.
19 visitors disagree.
observe the conversation on the matter concern https://twitter.com/ashadab665/status/1213769613810364416?s=19
those who, are in disagreement or have voted against this claim are requested to put forward the arguments thereof...
It's true we can't prove it's a reasonable act till we look at it from a secular point of view. But from the party's point of view, who believes in a 'Hindu Rashtra' this act was a well thought conspiracy.
not an india expert. but if you have a secular constitution, and you make a law about a specific religion, or excluding a specific religion, that sounds like a contradiction.
those who think that they have "reasons classification" in their minds as an argument then I am telling them that you wont be able to classify the act reasonably.. it's my challenge.
it violates article 14 of constitution of India.