Consensual incest is a real thing.

April 26, 2017, 4:33 pm

Agree9 Disagree4

69%
31%

The debate "Consensual incest is a real thing." was started by Mr_Beuller on April 26, 2017, 4:33 pm. 9 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 4 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

thereal posted 7 arguments to the agreers part.
historybuff posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.

Mr_Beuller, thereal, MrLuke, SirIntegra and 5 visitors agree.
historybuff and 3 visitors disagree.

ototoxic
replied to...

Dude... look up the last 1000 years of the royal bloodline in England. Infact, look at all of human (and animal) history. In the animal kingdom, sex is sex, siblings tend to stray away from f***ing eachother but some still do. In humans, sometimes siblings fall for eachother or get caught up in lust, it has been happening since before recorded history.

I know that Southern America has the cousin banging stereotypes, but old European families are notorious for incest, and notorious for the genetic diseases that came as fallout.

1 year, 10 months ago

it is estimated that the Mongols killed 5% of the total population of the world during the turko-mongol invasions and they were very religious. in present day population that would be around 350 million. obviously there were alot less people back then.

add to that crusades, jihads, inquisitions, which hunts, holy wars, heretical burnings, persecution of minorities (such as jews) and you're looking at staggering death tolls killed for no reason other than what god they prayed to or how they prayed to them.

religion is responsible for many, many atrocities. saying that religion is the source of morals is absolutely moronic.

1 year, 10 months ago
PsychDave
replied to...

Thereal, you have repeatedly been warned and told to stop being an insulting child. When you learn to debate like a big boy, I will treat you like one. Until then, I'm going to ignore you like the toddler who needs a time out you are acting like.

1 year, 10 months ago

funny how you state that they both killed "millions" but dont actually state how MANY millions they each killed. Could it be because you know you would get destroyed or is it just because youre plain stupid? Its also funny that you state Hitler was a "theist" even though he persecuted Christians and was recorded as mocking the beliefs of Christianity and has never actually said to have had belief in God. It helps if you actually have some knowledge nemiroff but unfortunately you are very stupid.

1 year, 10 months ago

Stalin was an atheist who killed 60 million.

Hitler was an atheist who killed 11 million.

Demolished.

1 year, 10 months ago
Nemiroff
replied to...

Stalin was an atheist who killed millions.
Hitler was a theist who killed millions.

demolished.

1 year, 10 months ago

Now go back to f***ing goats and the other things that atheists do.

1 year, 10 months ago

this is why i call you stupid and a goatf***er, psychdave. you prove that you are thos things everytime you open your mouth. Stalin, who was an atheist, and communism, which is an atheistic political ideology, in a period of 3 decades killed more people than how many people were killed in all religious wars since the year 1000 AD. If you werent an ignorant goatf***er with HIV, you would know this as opposed to spouting nonsense. If 1 atheist can do that much damage, imagine how much damage an entire nation of atheists could do, it is truely terrifying. they would be eating their mothers alive! this is why atheists have no morals and i have repeatedly proven this multiple times to your ignorant self. Secondly, your logic is flawed in general anyway because even if more violence was done in the name of religion than atheism (which it wasnt), it would have something to do with, i dont know, the fact that atheists didnt even exist until around the late 1800s?Why are you so stupid psychdave? you shouldve been killed at birth because your stupidity truely annoys me and you are a disgrace.

1 year, 10 months ago
PsychDave
replied to...

There is more violence done in the name of God than atheism. Just because you can't tell right from wrong without God telling you the difference doesn't mean no one can. This has been repeatedly and thoroughly covered.

1 year, 10 months ago

this is why without god there are no morals. if everyone was atheist the world would be inhabited by savages

1 year, 10 months ago
Nemiroff
replied to...

I brought up cannibalism and it is very relevant. it is a disturbing and socially unacceptable act, that was done at least once, consensually. it's an identical situation.

1 year, 10 months ago

I dont think incest is becoming a thing in europe. This mainly happens in US and i'd say that it has hugely been influenced by porn industries.

1 year, 10 months ago
M3phisto
replied to...

Cannibalism is irrelevant to topic. Thereal stop deforming what i said you lil childish brat. Incest is still illegal no matter of the consensus or it becoming a real thing. If you do it you go to jail, i didnt said that you shouldnt do it.

1 year, 10 months ago

and yes, i read an article about consenual cannibalism in germany as nemiroff said. he posted an ad online and got a volunteer. the volunteer then turned up to the cannibals house and he ate him.

1 year, 10 months ago

wow, m3phisto basically just said that something shouldnt be allowed because its illegal lmfao what an idiot

1 year, 10 months ago

there was a case if consensual canabalism in Germany a year or 2 ago. the canabal posted an ad online, and got. volunteer.

1 year, 11 months ago

maybe I've just misunderstood, but of course there is consentual incest. the word incest does not imply that it isn't consentual.

1 year, 11 months ago

Incest is still illegal, no matter of the consensus.

1 year, 11 months ago
Discuss "Consensual incest is a real thing. " family relationships society
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.