Debates on the existence of God are pointless because neither side can provide solid evidence to

February 28, 2016, 6:11 am

Agree8 Disagree9

47%
53%

The debate "Debates on the existence of God are pointless because neither side can provide solid evidence to" was started by Voidiq on February 28, 2016, 6:11 am. 8 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 9 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most people are against to this statement.

Voidiq posted 2 arguments, PoliticsAsUsual posted 2 arguments, RyanWakefield posted 1 argument to the agreers part.


Voidiq, PoliticsAsUsual, R_o_h_i_t, SarahQueen, ReadyToBegin, RyanWakefield, ElisaXO and 1 visitor agree.
historybuff, barman, absureality, carlos1ja, sgilmour2001, Jason9374 and 3 visitors disagree.

"science doesn't prove that there's no God, only that God isn't necessary. " -Stephen Hawking

3 years, 9 months ago
PoliticsAsUsual
replied to...

yes

3 years, 9 months ago

I understand those debates, but debates that where no side can prove each other wrong is kind of pointless.

3 years, 9 months ago

God is faith.

there can be debate about the accuract of literal readings of some holy text tho

3 years, 9 months ago

there is god which is simply the belief in your mind

3 years, 9 months ago

...disprove the other's belief.

(ran out of characters)

3 years, 9 months ago
Discuss "Debates on the existence of God are pointless because neither side can provide solid evidence to" religion science society
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.