The debate "Democracy has hampered economic progress" was started by
October 23, 2019, 12:16 pm.
11 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 17 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Aryaman999 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Aryaman999, MightyJackalope, chelseat99, Audrey23, marky, Unaluhabe and 5 visitors agree.
K1VK2DF, Mice, Agrumentman, Thinkinghead, civilizeddiscussion and 12 visitors disagree.
What's your example of a democracy that is economically superior? Is it China? They still have elections, it's just for a representative, not party.
undemocratic governments tend to be more corrupt and missuse more gov funds.
slower decision making can lead to better decision making.
undemocratic systems have no choice in leadership, and often lead to bad, oppressive leaders.
undemocratic systems allow no right to vote.
any system can put emphasis on anything.
It might allow misuse of public funds and time. ...
It instigates corruption. ...
It risks the wrong choice of public servants. ...
It allows not exercising the right to vote. ...
It may put more emphasis on quantity, rather than quality. ...
It can take long to make decisions.