The debate "Do any right wing sources have any integrity" was started by
March 20, 2018, 11:15 am.
By the way, Nemiroff is disagreeing with this statement.
18 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 7 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Nemiroff posted 4 arguments, MajorGeneralX posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
brontoraptor, Conservative81, Light and 15 visitors agree.
MajorGeneralX, bruh352, Guerre, Nemiroff and 3 visitors disagree.
so can anyone name a single right wing source that has integrity?
its a yes or no question seperate from any left wing comparison. i certainly feel that i can name left wing sources with integrity.
My chicken wings have integrity
I would say the left have no integrity, this really isn't debatable, all this thread is would be name calling
I'd like clarification on some things
Fake liberals, was this a typo or are we going "no true Scotsman" fallacy?
Cherry picked local crime, technically the school shooting crimes are local, and all news stations work on this. I hardly ever see "lost puppy" stories, on slow days maybe weather conditions. And what of the saying 'an injustice to one of us is one to all of us'? I'm thinking that they don't solely do this either, I may see a few and think they can do better, but I don't think they completely lack pundits.
Endless political hit jobs, usually decided on bias. I could say that the hit jobs on Trump have been endless, not one sex scandal has panned out and some had terminology practically lifted from other cases or were missing details, yet in the end pee erotica and misinformation filled the internet.
Ignoring key issues, how so? what key issue do you feel is misrepresented. Could you elaborate? and do you believe that any liberal stations are ignoring key issues by the same measure.
It is I believe a bit about bias. I was going to reply on a previous conversation we had on "fake news" and how "do better" really sells the thought short. It is true that bias will exist, and it isn't a problem until that bias prefaces the facts. But then again, that interpretation is a short but sweet answer, do better.
most of my right wing opponents don't even understand the left wing policies they argue against. It's fine to disagree, but when they can't describe what their opposition is trying to do, what are they arguing against? a made up boogieman?
bias is not the issue. integrity is. I can be pro regulations and still not do unwarranted hit pieces on my opposition.
NPR is my gold standard. not only does it routinely bring in conservative experts, leaders, and candidates, it even brings in editors and contributers from serious right wing publications like the national review. even if the staff believes in minimum wage or something, they can still cover the news.
look at my list of grievances in my first post here. no mention of having a personal bias, but everything about misrepresenting facts, misrepresenting the opposition, and generally being little more than trash propaganda.
I would ask, what do you find to be an unbiased news source? I personally do not have an answer.
thats the reason why i am aligned to the left. Iam pro communism and socialism. These right wings are the most racist of all and are totally incapable of running governments.
PS: Im not a member of FARC . so no need to fear :P
fake liberals, cherry picked local crime stories, endless political hit jobs, ignoring key issues... this isn't about bias, this is about straight up fake news.
and I'm not talking breitbart here, I'm talking fox, the (sadly) creme de la creme of conservative news. it only gets worse from there.