The debate "Dogs should be allowed everywhere. even in museums and gardens" was started by
July 25, 2014, 12:05 pm.
By the way, MerciPol is disagreeing with this statement.
26 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 42 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Michelle_M posted 1 argument, AngryBlogger posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
laurafuna, true_debate_life, evamara, Psych_Code, scooter6381, brandilyn, david365, linares34, meme, thatguy, FluffiestDrop45, Dhruv, AlenaMaisel and 13 visitors agree.
MerciPol, Michelle_M, wmd, ayleine, YoanaPetrova, Mastermind, londonlightz, Argumention, AngryBlogger, sloanstar1000, nylia32, action007man, srbanano, iiks, esoo717, jjrocks1738, numbskull, swp16, blue, llemponen, NaggingNut, Zuhayr, KiwiSheepTrainer, redstar and 18 visitors disagree.
Our own gardens and our own museums are not the property of the dogs. We spent time and effort building them up and so I don't find it that much to ask of dogs to simply stay away. There are other places they can have and if they decided to mark them as their territory, I think that WE should stay away as well. We should all be entitled to our own works, should we put the effort in.
(Of course, dogs aren't really allowed to roam free anymore so I'm sure any dog that tried to mark their own territory would be brought in and eventually killed only because we weren't able to find an adequate owner for them - as though they need an owner.)
they would cause a mess.
Umm... do you really want a dog to mark a priceless piece of art in a museum? Or digging up plants in gardens? Not very wise.