The debate "Donald Trump is not really pro-life" was started by
November 27, 2016, 2:14 pm.
12 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 9 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
PoliticsAsUsual posted 4 arguments, Neopatriarch posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
neveralone posted 2 arguments, Blue_ray posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
Neopatriarch, PoliticsAsUsual, dalton7532, allyssa, carrieunderwood007 and 7 visitors agree.
Stidlet, slipknot, Blue_ray, LSpalding, Yanksxx21, sabrina and 3 visitors disagree.
why? why would you be obligated to do something that stupid? attacking Iran will cause, chaos, death, and destruction. nothing good can come from it.
why an idiot? If iran doesnot stop, is the US expected to remain silent? The US is obliged to take a military action in that case.
that didn't even make sense. I'm pretty sure he meant abortion, not Iran.
and if Donald Trump attacked Iran he would be the biggest idiot ever to be elected. not that he isn't already.
if DJ Trump was Con-life, He would have already destroyed Iran after they allegedly tested a ballastic missle
"Time does not determine if you could kill someone"
the problem with your argument is the word someone. since a fetus isn't a person your argument is moot.
Time does not determine if you could kill someone. If someone was given a time frame to shoot you legally in one hour, wouldn't that be stupid?
no I feel we need programs to help her and the life she has with her.
it will when it grows.
on the flip side r u prepared to disregard the baby?
nope. just going off of what was said in the previous post
Control dictates whether a right exists?
clearly the 2 are mutually exclusive. are you fine with completely disregarding the women? @neveralone
btw, does the baby, even a newborn forget a fetus, have any ability to control or make decisions for their body? sure they can have the right, but do they have the ability to control anything?
what about the baby's rights to control theirs?
the damage of undermining women's rights to control their own bodies.
what kind of damage buff?
well let's all hope they're not. otherwise it might take decades to undo the damage.
Doesnt matter if he is. As long as his appointments are.
yeah. he talks out of both sides of his mouth on a regular basis. complete wild card. an excellent presidential quality (sarcasm)
I think he showed his hand when he claimed to be pro-life, and then praised the merits of planned parenthood in the same breath.
I don't think he's pro anything except himself. my biggest hope is that he cares more about his long term legacy than his short term power/money thirst.