The debate "E-cigarettes shouldn't be banned from public places" was started by
January 4, 2014, 4:37 pm.
22 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 15 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
BespokeJokeBloke posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
echofrommadiun posted 1 argument, Superr1fifty posted 1 argument, lg posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
LECR, BespokeJokeBloke, tkershaw3, SpiritofDeath, simplykk, Sosocratese, Scottie, Hjkp98, Haelaeif, Getmurked, Alex11113, Shreedeep and 10 visitors agree.
zlatanera, JakeX3099, echofrommadiun, harveyspectre, Mikey2k, Superr1fifty, lg, Kirito, taigaaisaka, transfanboy and 5 visitors disagree.
They produce smoke that is harmful to anyone who breathes it in. Contrary to what some people will tell you e-cigarettes produce smoke and damage/destroy lungs. Why should people with bad habits that destroy their lungs be allowed to destroy other peoples lungs too via. secondhand smoke?
They're cigarettes enyway.
Is there another cigarette called e-cigarette? What is the difference with the usual cigarette? I still don’t know. Whatever the kind of cigarettes is, it should be banned from public places like bus stations, train stations, mosques, churches, schools and other public places. Besides it is an unhealthy attitude, the passive smokers- who inhale its smoke- have higher risk to get diseases than the active one.
I know so many people who gave up smoking with ecigarettes. But if children start using them then they're not worth it.