The debate "Ematio and UnderdogMike are the same person" was started by
an anonymous person on
February 28, 2017, 5:52 am.
2 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 2 people are on the disagree side.
There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is.
There is a tie in this debate, post your arguments, call some reinforcements and break this tie.
TheExistentialist posted 2 arguments, Blu_Ray posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
Blu_Ray, TheExistentialist agree.
Nemiroff, Ematio disagree.
Lmfao, all of you are literally sibling-f***ing libtard cucks.
Ematio is my son. he jumped on here first. lol
Look at the "is evolution science" thread again. Then look at the "2 genders" thread. Look at how similar their answers are, and yet don't engage with one another at all. Look at the time stamps on those threads too.
While I agree that Ematio and Mike aren't like @thereal and @najam1 in their approach, it seems oddly suspicious that 2 people come in at roughly the same time @ematio's first comment was about 8 hours ago and Mike was about 4 hours after that. They both started on the same threads, making some of the same comments (with just a few exceptions). No engagement between each other, even though they replied and were replied to by the same people regarding the same line of questioning. It also seems like 1 will pop up in a thread out of nowhere and continue on a similar line of reasoning as the other.
Now, it may be too far of a stretch to call them the same person as @thereal and @najam1; however, I do see some similarities in terms of their grasp of the concepts their arguing.
today, when i signed in, they popped up at the same time. Argued at same discussions and didnt engage each other. Maybe a single guy is making multiple accounts.
both are same.
I definitely don't think they are najam/thereal. those 2 were incapable of discussion and mostly just restated their original absolutist view mixed with belligerent insult filled rants.
ematio, who I do feel is grossly misinformed, is at least tackling questions and evidence with logic. he raises issues of nuance and detail in his questioning of evolution, I just wonder if he would apply the same level of critical thought equally to his predetermined position. he seems more similar to dalton, a religious, creationist conservative, who is really a large portion of our population.
I haven't tackled Mike much yet (or ematio yet really either) but they do seem to keep to separate topics. (politics for mike, religion for ematio) as long as he doesn't try to reinforce his points with his own account or just actively troll like najam, it wouldn't bother me if they were the same and he just doesn't want to tie his politics with his religion.
the timing of entering the app is the only suspicious thing, but it could be coincidence. I think it's early to jump to conclusions.
Both popped up about the same time (if you look at their posting history). Both tend to argue the same. I'd even go so far as to suggest that it's probably the same person as @thereal and @najam1. Just seems too convenient for another duo to have sprung up just a little while after @psychdave exposed them earlier.