The debate "Even watching one interview by Assad makes it hard to believe he did the bad things hes accused of" was started by
April 13, 2017, 11:33 pm.
6 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 9 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
thereal posted 5 arguments to the agreers part.
PsychDave posted 3 arguments, Nemiroff posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
thereal and 5 visitors agree.
Nemiroff, MrShine, wmd, PsychDave, The13yearoldconservative and 4 visitors disagree.
Assad needs to step down for he had done atrocities in Syria
I'm sorry. I assumed the next sentence "They are wrong and demonstratably delusional, but they can make what sounds like good points." would explain why their arguments were relevant, but I see I have again overestimated your intelligence and reading comprehension.
As I've said, I have seen interviews with him, though I require translation to understand his message. I guess you didn't read that far.
Do you have an argument, or are you simply being contrary at this point?
Also, as you've already been banned temporarily for that specific insult, please resist the temptation to use it.
it is absolutely hilarious that when you hear "logic has failed us before" and then shown an example of FAILED LOGIC, you conclude the speaker clearly believes this example labeled as FAILED LOGIC.
you completely remind me of Drax from guardians of the galaxy. a man with the most linear and basic of thought processes that define his entire race, and most humans under the age of 10.
this is probably the greatest testament to your "superior" intellect.
once again, sarcasm and arguments whose purpose is to show how ridiculous your attempts at logic are, go right over your head. good job.
again watching his interview and how convincing it is doesn't matter. what matters is the facts. so besides an interview do u have anything proving his innocence or a better canadite?
all of your accusations can easily be debunked and logically and factually disproven if one decides to watch his interview. However, you f***ed a goat (your mother) therefore you are too stupid to do so. Dont worry, keep thinking the earth is flat.
lmao youre a f***ing retard and far below my intellectual level, im not even going to bother responding to you. After all why would i bother giving a true response to a complete imbecile that gets convinced that the world is flat becaus his knowledge and common sense is so hollow? looool looks like we have a flat earth conspirator here guys! Im not surprised that you believe the world os flat to be fair, they donsay the stupidest people are the easiest to fool!
Rather than simply being your usual insulting childish self, how about you try to debate like a grownup?
What body language do you perceive him giving that cannot be faked? If this were a legitimate way of judging someone's honestly, why wouldn't courts use it? Any good salesman can convince you of his/her honesty and that they want what is best for you. It just always turns out that doing what they want is always what is best. Politicians are salesmen, but they are selling themselves. They are convincing people that the are the best choice. It is more surprising that there are politicians who are NOT convincing than that one is.
There are people who make what sounds like logical arguments for the world being flat. They are wrong and demonstratably delusional, but they can make what sounds like good points. When dealing with international politics, there is rarely a good guy and bad guy. There are lots of guys doing what they believe is best for their country and themselves.
Let's look at both possibilities. If Assad gassed his own people, would he and his country benefit more from admitting it, or blaming someone else? Obviously, blaming someone else benefits them twofold. They get away with gassing people they wanted dead, and their enemies get blamed and lose international support. If Assad did not do it, he obviously benefits more by telling the truth and by lying and taking responsibility for a war crime. Either way, his speeches and denials would be the same.
I don't know for sure that he is responsible for the gas attack, but saying no one who has seen his speeches could do anything but believe him is patently false. There are people around the world watching him, and many believe he is guilty. As he doesn't tend to speak in English, I tend to only see him and hear a translator, so I suspect some gets lots in translation, but I have yet to ever see anyo whose speaking convinced me that they could not be lying or hiding anything.
signs are always given off. his body language says he is telling the truth. forget the body language, even the rational arguments he presents say he is telling the truth. But of course that doesnt matter to stupid liberal airheads.
Your opinion is irrelevant as it is ignorant as usual.
isn't the point of trying to fool people into thinking something is trying to fool people into thinking something? u can easily hide all the signs.
This is why youre a retard and proves that you havent even seen a single interview by Assad himself. Hitler and King were both excellent public speakers, though hitler was slightly better, but in Hitlers speeches he was very aggressive and militaristic in nature. You can tell from his speeches what type of person he was. With King, his speeches were the opposite and you could also tell what type of person he was too. In Assads interviews, he is a very rational, logical thinker and anybody who knows the tiniest shit particle about body language can tell you that he is not being deceptive or dishonest, rather he is stating the truth. Most retards who complain about Assad havent even seen a single interview by him and if you havent even done that, how can you even have an opinion of him? Are you just going to be a typical American retard and munch on what the media SAYS about him but never SHOWS about him? All im saying is watch his latest interview on the Syrian "chemical attacks" and the US tomahawk strikes. His argument is completely logical and anybody would think that Assad was the leader of a so-called "democratic power", not Trump. Until you actually watch his interviews, your opinion is worth little more than a pile of shit.
Being eloquent and good at speaking in no way shows what kind if person someone is. Martin Luther King Jr was an amazing public speaker and a great person. Hitler was an excellent public speaker, but was a monster.