The debate "Evolutionists often doubt pieces of evidence against evolution instead of realizing a possible flaw" was started by
April 27, 2017, 4:34 am.
5 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 14 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Ematio posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
Nemiroff posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
Ematio, thereal, TimRSA and 2 visitors agree.
makson, M3phisto, Nemiroff, historybuff, PsychDave, MrLuke, DrakeVonSchweetz and 7 visitors disagree.
*idiocracy is where it belongs
your analogy is not weird, it's from idiocracy. and considering you didn't name a single actual flaw but just a general, unspecified, mystery flaw, democracy is where this argument belongs.
Evolutionists are not all the same. Which flaws are u talking about?
Lol my analogy might be a bit weird XD
If evolution is so scientific, why is it that evolutionists are so quick to explain away things instead of accepting a possible flaw in the theory?
If I have a theory that plants require Gatorade to grow, should I ignore every person who gives me reasons as to why that's not true?