The debate "Extra terrestrials are undoubtedly existent and have had mingled with us for thousands of years" was started by
August 3, 2015, 9:28 pm.
20 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 25 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
AstroSpace posted 7 arguments to the agreers part.
sloanstar1000 posted 4 arguments, historybuff posted 12 arguments, PsychDave posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
AstroSpace, graples, dgw23, Jlav0820, thatdebatingchick, theQueenofdebate, wayneSPEC, aceofhearts, PranavArora, countrybumpkin, WaspToxin and 9 visitors agree.
PsychDave, sloanstar1000, historybuff, sabrina, DerpedLocke, benrpollak, ayofi, ELIJAHJ, bamasam777, Tristanzee and 15 visitors disagree.
The "evidence" in support of this is entirely based in nonsense and lies. Please watch that video i linked. It explains it pretty well in 9 minutes. Ancient Nuclear Warfare - AA Debunked on youtube.
as Dave said. please link to supporting evidence. I have looked and everything I find contradicts you.
Saying "experts have proven" doesn't actually prove anything. Name some of the experts, the scientific papers documenting the sites or anything else that provides verifiable proof beyond your statements. We can our own research, but so far I have yet to find any that supports your position.
You haven't disproven anything that experts have proven. Scientists from around the world agree that there are ancient radioactive sites. To say it never happened is like saying the Aztec simply never existed. They're just a hoax.
Please comment on the debate. respond to the points I made. do you accept that I have explained all your supposed alien events?
Because agreeing with someone who has proven you wrong on literally every point is wrong somehow. you make no sense.
Exactly sloany, don't take sides like a dumb follower.
historybuff already made the argument against yours I'm not going to just repeat what he said.
I never said there was absolutely no possibility that aliens could interact with earth. I also never said that radioactive sites don't exist... wth?
You apparently just pretend that I've said something and argue with that. You're incapable of debating like an adult, forget it
and here is a link that explains the helicopter hieroglyph. in short they tried to carve over a previous carving. http://raincool.blogspot.ca/2010/05/helicopter-hieroglyphs-explained.html
And i actully did some research. please link to anywhere that has any proof that there was a nuclear blast. Because that video disproves all their arguments.
Sorry here is the link to the video that completely disproves the nuclear explosion lies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=20&v=K9ed_hWZnl8
sloanstar, It's hilarious how you say that there is absolutely no possibility at all that aliens have interacted with us in the past or present. You are the most close minded person I've ever seen. You say the radioactive sites don't exist? LMFAO Yes they do. You can literally go visit them. Can you not just admit that you don't know anything about this topic? You obviously dont, because I've noticed you just say "there's no evidence" wait for someone else to attack my arguement, then just agree with them. If you ever took a look at reality through your stone cave you would understand that Pyramids don't just spawn in the middle of a desert, and that ancient cities aren't exploded into ash and dust by nothing. What a joke. Do some research. Someone said that the hyroglyph wasn't a helicopter? What is it then? A 5 year old could see that.
I'm getting the feeling you just watched the TV show ancient aliens and didn't bother to read anything at all about it. Because in literally every episode they straight out lie. especially the one about the supposed nuclear explosion.
Or if you don't want to read, watch this 9 minute video that completely destroys the idea.
could you first at least acknowledge that historybuff laid waste to all of your previous arguments before moving on to the next one?
It's almost as if you are unable to admit that you're ever wrong about anything. I would have hoped you learned a lesson after rage quitting last time, but apparently not.
As it turns out it was really easy to disprove. It is simply a lie. There is no evidence that the site is radioactive. None of the archeologists claimed that it was. It was made up later. There is no evidence that the buildings were damaged by an explosion. Many of them were in tact. Some as high as 15 ft tall. Seeing as they were made of mud a nuclear blast would certainly have leveled them. There were very few bodies and there is no evidence they died suddenly. There were 37 bodies found and they didn't die at the same time, and they were given a burial. This is where i found the information. http://ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/ancient-nuclear-warefare/
Yes historybuff, explain me this. Why us the ancient city of India, Rajasthan, currently radioactive from a nuclear blast? A blast that experts date back 8000 to 12000 years ago, a blast the ancients described as the "brightness of 1,000 suns," stating that "the corpses we're burned to be unrecognizable, their hair and nails fell out." Explain this to me.
I looked up the Nazca lines and they are easily explained in how they were made and why. I'll grant the picture you are referring to does look a bit like a space suit but it is not even close to proof. Look at this article for a reasonable explanation. http://ancientaliensdebunked.com/the-nazca-astronautowlman-or-fisherman/ The Egyptian Hieroglyph you mentioned only appears in one place in all of Egypt. If they really encountered Aliens why would there only be one picture. Also it isn't clearly a helicopter. The publicized photos were digitally altered to make them look more like a helicopter. And even if buildings did correspond to Orion's belt, so what? They are visible from earth and the stars are significant in many cultures. You don't need alien contact to copy a pattern of stars. Any other pseudo science you would like me to explain with a quick google search?
Sure sloan. For example, the Nazca lines are huge images in the ground, only can be seen from the sky. There is an image that shows a being with large eyes in a helmet and spacesuit, what can only be described as an alien. Look up Egyptian helicopter glyph. Also, many ancient structures align perfectly with Orions belt, where they say the gods come from. Seriously, look up some of these carvings. The symbology us everywhere from stories to structures, and stories about "gods" having wars with bombs and nuclear weapons thousands of years ago.
historybuff, if an alien race is capable of travelling to earth through space, they have vastly more superior weapons. You're elementary inference is invalid.
I will accept you have seen something you can't identify that was flying, fine, but if you're going to say there is ancient evidence, could you be more specific please?
Oh now your arguments make sense. you want all those guns to fight off aliens.
Actually, there's plenty of evidence. I myself have seen UFOs, but the evidence also lies in ancient history books as well as government files.
well there's certainly no evidence for this... I'm getting sort of a deja vu vibe here.