The debate "FDR MIGHT not of been the best president for the job economically" was started by
December 1, 2016, 10:36 am.
5 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 4 people are on the disagree side.
There needs to be more votes to see what the common perception is.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
neveralone posted 3 arguments to the agreers part.
PoliticsAsUsual posted 2 arguments, neveralone posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
neveralone, Yanksxx21, Blue_ray and 2 visitors agree.
PoliticsAsUsual and 3 visitors disagree.
he sounded good but a little low keyed. he wasn't the right president for his time but was a great one. besides economically which is normal since none of them did at the time so I don't hold it against him
nope. never looked into him.
hmm interesting I wonder why discovery said he was more of a pres. that looked good more than anything else. any opinions on Coolidge
he started the monopoly busting and brought about the redistribution and regulation that empowered the citizenry and allowed us to prosper.
for the people who disagreed could u defend ur statement
true. he was definitely the one that could connect better with the people
Roosevelt was good though.......
I was watching discovery channel (love it) about the president and apparently they believe FDR was good politically but not economically. that hoover was better economically he just happened to be there at the wrong time