The debate "Feminism = Equal rights regardless of gender or sex" was started by
November 26, 2015, 8:25 pm.
34 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 29 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Yuki_Amayane posted 1 argument, PsychDave posted 1 argument, damez posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Dev posted 1 argument, Craven198787 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Yuki_Amayane, PsychDave, calebtanner, Dina, DannyknowsItAll, action007man, Sumerian, Band_Nerd_24, Daffa8799, damez, AzelG, Godfather98, NameWasTakn, jack_tim_45, SwaggerPoptart, tyler0300, TanishKuvar11, Groot and 16 visitors agree.
HRPufnStuf, Dysfunctional, Dev, Schnuupi, NotoriousBishop, JakobBoghora, Adrian, RedWolf, The13yearoldconservative, Craven198787 and 19 visitors disagree.
comparing rosie odonald to arnold shwartzenegger is not a comparison of men to women, but a comparison of body builders to obese people.
if you take a body building woman and compare her to a lazy obese man, your argument gets destroyed.
if they can do the job, they should get paid for the job. generalized qualities do not superceed the qualities of the individual.
I believe in equal rights for women men and those who are in between or whatever but if you hired Arnold Schwarzenegger and Rosie O'Donald to pick up rocks in a field and these were heavy rocks in at the end of the day you got more work out of Arnold Schwarzenegger wouldn't it be reasonable to pay Arnold more money than Rosie O'Donnell because of the work load was sustained more easily and more efficiently by a I don't have a person more qualified to do this
ummm... if we are classing feminism as the belief that both genders should have equal rights and opportunities, then I can disprove that statement. I really like spiders. I regularly save them from various bath tubs and corners and frequently have to remove them for men who are scared of them before they get hurt (talking about the spider here, not the man's ego).
feminist are tough until a spider crawls in the room
btw, faulty generalization is also a fallacy.
true modern feminism would be what is held by the leadership of actual representative feminist organizations.
isolated YouTube or Twitter feminists represent their personal feminism, but have nothing to do with the broader movement.
otherwise I am right in saying all Republicans are racist bigots because some Republicans are racist bigots. generalizations do not make good arguments.
it is possible that Twitter feminists actually do represent the population, but you'd have to actual prove that, not assume it.
you do realize this post is over half a year old and the person likely won't answer your question...
you made several feminism posts, what was the point of also resurrecting all the old ones as well?
Just in case your not a troll
You probably never heard of #killallmen, Die Cis Scum, Castration Day, and The SCUM manifesto before haven't you? And please don't agure that those Feminist aren't true Feminist cause that's the No True Scotsman Fallacy
True feminism is seeking equality, however the movement has been partially hijacked by those seeking special treatment and using it as justification for stupid things.
Honestly, I'd just like to see what arguments you can present. What is your stance and why?