The debate "Free will does not exist" was started by
February 17, 2015, 1:53 pm.
20 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 13 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Kinakuza posted 1 argument, I_Voyager posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
I_Voyager, Sosocratese, liamjosephcash, Razzakel, kennediharris515, Satvik_Soni, LeaderOfDiscussion, BloodyCarousel, Kinakuza, true_debate_life, Egert_Clueless and 9 visitors agree.
DavidStuff777, wmd, rubellum, Hjkp98, pagenewberry, Wantonjon, resiliently and 6 visitors disagree.
I more or less agree. You can bestly say it's conditional will, reactive will. Definitely limited will.
If there really is Free Will as they say, people would not be arrested for their 'free' doings. There's no free will. There's boundaries in everything we do. I do not think that no free will is something negative but that's my opinion.