Freud was a quack

December 13, 2017, 11:18 am

Agree20 Disagree8

71%
29%

The debate "Freud was a quack" was started by Nemiroff on December 13, 2017, 11:18 am. 20 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 8 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

Nemiroff posted 3 arguments, Gorgon posted 1 argument to the agreers part.


Nemiroff, rodney, MrShine, Gorgon, Slymcfly, tylathecat and 14 visitors agree.
subhasmita and 7 visitors disagree.

Agreed. Freud's findings haven't been taken seriously by academics for a while, now.

5 months, 3 weeks ago

bump

5 months, 3 weeks ago

bump

9 months, 3 weeks ago

his techniques were revolutionary, but his reasoning and conclusions were horribly wrong.

Oedipus complex is nonsense! not even Oedipus had an Oedipus complex. I don't think anyone wants to kill their same sex parent and sleep with the opposite one. well, won't say no one, but it certainly isn't true about the general population.

his description of every phase of life as being sexual probably said more about him then the patients he treated. infants and toddlers don't have an oral fixation! taste is just one of the senses and it isn't the only way they interact with the world at that age. We just don't notice/care when they see, hear, smell, or touch things with their fingers.

10 months, 1 week ago
Discuss "Freud was a quack" science
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.