The debate "Globalization is good for the world" was started by
June 1, 2016, 12:48 am.
By the way, Caitz2427 is disagreeing with this statement.
13 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 10 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Caitz2427 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
MichaelEaborn, JLabang123 and 11 visitors agree.
Caitz2427, josh_rocks, Austin7779, bigB, joplinnocera, nellie11iah and 4 visitors disagree.
Depending on which perspective you take. Larger countries who are more developed and not suffering from the impacts of colonization or neocolonialism really thrive through globalization.
However, the developing world is crushed by the global market and destroyed by things like the IMF/World Bank.
Not good for the world as a whole, but can be quite beneficial for countries who have had more time to develop as a state (400 years as opposed to 40 years). This is usually at the expense of the developing world.
-Creating a global nation is not good. As Donald says, we should not sing the false song of globalism.
I think it is bad for the world because
People get underpaid
The air gets filled with smoke the can harm the environment
People work for long hours
Small businesses are being overtaken
This is just a few reasons why