The debate "God is a figure that doesn't exist" was started by
September 1, 2017, 9:22 am.
14 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 28 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
locke posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Drakgo posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
DiabolikIzzy, lowtemp and 12 visitors agree.
amS07, shubham90012, Drakgo, laila, officiallsse, Frank, jjcnyc87, sabrina, locke and 19 visitors disagree.
Reckless? So you're saying someone who doesn't believe there is a superior being is reckless? So tell me how the people who do not believe in a higher power be unconcerned about the consquences of our actions. first, however, what are the consequences?
Locke, that was my point as you, but to rule out that there is a superior being to our grand design would be wreckless, even for a scientist.
Can you prove that there is a god? No. Can you prove the big bang is true? No. Point is we don't know how we came about, we can't fully grasp or begin to understand our true purpose, but for now we're left with the greatest debate.
Why would or how would an old man sit on a cloud? With that said, you denounce a idea of a higher being because you can't prove it. So, you speak with sarcasm in hopes that it proves your point as credible.
Even scientists are now coming to the conclusion that the idea of the sarcastic big bang theory is preposterous. To say all of existence is a mere accident is absurd.
And what I say, is fact.
yes the proof is that the hubble space telescope captures amazing images of our universe, but not one image displays an old man sitting on a cloud
Science explains the environment. But what does the environment have to do with God?
Do you prefer enslavement?
god is nothing it is just our believeness if they really exist then say me how we have to fight with environment changes
OP is a professional comedian.
Do you have proof to support this statement?