The debate "Gov should be provided access to social media accounts of citizens" was started by
October 18, 2019, 9:40 am.
26 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 32 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
Aryaman999 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Levantin posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Aryaman999, H, honey_gunner and 23 visitors agree.
Levantin, lmaoimsad, K1VK2DF, Agrumentman, chelrasonjohn, bitchimaqueen and 26 visitors disagree.
not in this specific social media example, i agree with jdwag, government has no business here.... but you said in general "government should not get invovled in more things, nothing but downsides".
i see lots of upsides to government getting involved in medicine and food production. many other necessary things as well.
What would be the point of that? We should get government out of more things, not more involved. There's nothing but downsides to doing that
I mean that the Government will provide and give you accounts like passport service
This is so open.. could you at least give an argument to start? At first glance I can see no real reason to it to be the case
Access to see them, edit them, seize them? What kind of access are we talking about?