The debate "Government lets the wealthy bypass the will of the people by controlling to the politician" was started by
an anonymous person on
June 30, 2015, 5:54 pm.
29 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 4 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
I_Voyager posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
yasanjeewa, I_Voyager, amanofprogress, toughgamerjerry, Bxat9, arsonfly, kizrox, Enigma, BernieSanders4pres, Alp4president, AstroSpace, Trance, musejay1, dylan21502 and 15 visitors agree.
kaka, R3dD0g, Heartless_uh and 1 visitor disagree.
Warning: Stefan Molyneux is a crazy person. But he's one of the cutest because he hides it so well. Also, it's been a while since I've seen a problem with crazy culty people that had nothing to do with religion. Which is refreshing.
I've been watching the videos of anarchist Stefan Molyneux on Youtube. I don't agree with everything he says, but a lot of it is very well constructed and researched. I've distilled a principle from his philosophies which looks thus...
Either way, the wealthy would have to exploit the active potential of the mass in order to retain their wealth against the clash of the open market. If they were not competent in retaining customer loyalty over time their competitor would take their wealth and they would no longer be the wealthy. If politicians design regulatory rules, the wealthy can exploit the strong distance between people and politicians and convince politicians to design rules which preserve the wealth of the wealthy. Regulation of industry is the window for corruption.