The debate "Guns should be banned" was started by
February 3, 2020, 10:43 am.
22 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 37 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
civilizeddiscussion posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
benmiller123 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
civilizeddiscussion, chickenfordiner, Anonymous42 and 19 visitors agree.
XxNotLogicalxX, MrShine, eva_pet35, benmiller123, jrardin12 and 32 visitors disagree.
Explain how is it fair plz??
*but lite classes teaching just safety and functionality are not enough.
ex law enforcement and military without a history of trouble have already passed the mark. civilians will need training, but lite class teaching basic safety and functionality. for carry permits you would have to take a class that includes tactics and coordinating with other armed people on the fly in order to prevent accidental collateral damage amidst the chaos of numerous armed and confused "good guys".
ive always said a good guy with a gun is great, many uncoordinated good guys with guns is chaos.
ownership without carry would have fewer restrictions, and yes, no semi/full auto, no explosives or grenade launchers. we arent single handedly fighting off whole gangs...
that sounds fair tbh, and no semi or auto
How do you prove to be capable to possessing a weapon?
guns should not be banned, but they should also not be a right available to every idiot and psycho by default. it should be a privilege one earns after proving oneself capable of posessing such a weapon.