The debate "Hillary clinton can not be trusted and shouldn't be presisdent" was started by
November 17, 2015, 11:59 am.
30 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 5 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
AstroSpace posted 2 arguments, Alex posted 5 arguments to the agreers part.
omactivate posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
AstroSpace, Alex, liberalssuck, Tiredandred, DannyknowsItAll, MarlemR, Band_Nerd_24, Tristanzee, MrShine, bigB, loupsolitaire, fredtyu, TheDuke, Wookie, thekid, Rokai, lexham, TonganCaillou, codyray16 and 11 visitors agree.
pajrc1234, Tien and 3 visitors disagree.
socialism is not a single ideology. there are many different branches to it. democratic socialism is very different than the socialism that you are talking about. you can certainly have a democratic socialism. Canada (and most other enlightened societies) have universal health care for example. we are still a democracy. so calling someone a socialist isn't an insult because it isn't very specific. it could mean alot of things. and most developed countries know that some socialism is a requirement of a modern state.
we have a president, one guy being the head. I could claim monarchy according to your logic. having bits of something does not mean you have that something.
last time I checked the us is a rebublic.
all modern states have socialist elements. literally all of them. even the united States.
name a socialist country that has happy citizens.
socialist is not a bad word. all modern states have embraced some level of socialism, even America. calling someone a socialist is not an insult.
I would love you to tell me how he, a brain surgin is an idiot. but go ahead, try
Berrie Sanders is a socialist. In case you didn't know, we are Americans, not commies.
Alex who do you support? If it's a republican I can give you 5 reasons why they're an idiot
he's pretty much the only candidate that doesn't seem like an idiot or a pawn for large corporations.
he's an idiot
Bernie Sanders is not a pawn
She's no different than most of the other candidates. they are pawns of massive corporations. I doubt any of them can be trusted to act in the best interest if Americans.
That is not an argument, it is a word. Could you frame you response in the form of a well thought out argument?
And which part of the whole benghazi tragedy makes her untrustworthy? Except for the stuff that fox news has managed to take out of context and assert without proof?
Does the fact that Republicans have been quoted saying that benghazi is a political weapon mitigate your claim?
Benghazi *cough cough*
Do you have a reason to feel that way?