The debate "Hillary or trump. who's gonna win" was started by
November 8, 2016, 10:21 am.
14 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 2 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Nemiroff posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
neveralone posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Blue_ray, Radhikadhawan, GodisGod, harshita, Rajat and 9 visitors agree.
neveralone and 1 visitor disagree.
yeah, they were mocking his usage of the word.
she wasn't being nasty, she was being as cordial as you should be with a debate opponent. Trump was the one using names and interrupting.
not sure how them quoting him makes them responsible. the nasty women is a well known stereotype used against a woman who shows any competitiveness, something that is supposed to be a pride among all americans, not just men. it was a well documented complaint. well before this year.
she was saying an uncomfortable truth in a competition with a man, therefore he gets to call her a nasty woman, and suddenly with 2 words the table of truth and facts is flipped against her.
and before you deny that, remember that he had no defense, he did not need one, it was his point in your mind just after that simple remark.
The backlash was by feminists complaining about what he called her. They all decided they were "nasty" too.
rather than just using the word as you please and letting others exercise their right to use whatever word they want, your leadership directly attacks the fact that someone else doesn't use their specific language.
that's PC bro.
and he was calling her a nasty woman while she was simply point out the truth that he is the only president that has not revealed his taxes in the modern era. he was the one throwing every lie he could about her.
you may think she's a nasty woman but she was being anything but nasty. he was the nasty one in those debates.
Nobody is demanding it. Republicans are pointing out that Democrats fear the term "Islamic Terrorism". They are too PC--too worried about making people feel bad to say it. Republicans dont want safe spaces, committees hounding oppositional views, bans on costumes. Republicans--frankly Conservatives want you to be able to say whatever you want. Yes, some people are awful, but we are entitled to our awfulness.
The encroaching idea that calling a spade a spade is wrong reveals PC culture. Trump was on the front page for saying hillary was a "nasty woman". I feel she is a nasty woman. It speaks nothing of other women; however, PC culture dictates that women are assumed nasty.
how is it a lie? a group of people demanding a specific form of language from other people.... isn't that what pc is? it's not limited to any group.
and the right wing pc is absolutely a different culture. left wing pc tried to tell hateful ******s to be more considerate. right wing pc is those hateful ******s insisting everyone also be hateful ******s.
That is an outright lie and perversion of what PC culture is. There is no contention it is propagated by the left.
Im talking about court cases and punishments of businesses choosing to uphold their beliefs in their own private entity.
And BLM wouldnt be an issue had they not made the rhetoric anti police and purely racial.
1st? you mean political correctness? are you serious? exactly how many people have been jailed, or even fined for breaking nonexistent political correctness laws?
public shaming of hateful ******s is not an act of government. it is the voice of the people also protected under the 1st ammendment. in fact the biggest pushers of political correctness in recent years has been republicans.
you MUST say Islamic terrorists
you MUST NOT say black lives matters
Not the people destroying the 1st amendment. You have to realize that the 1st we look at now is a perversion.
well Trump won
rule of law can be anythibg from sensible enforcement to an oppressive dictatorship... Nazi Germany had very little crime... mostly cause the smallest offense could make you dissappear? are you really so naive that you would be OK with that?
and your 100 years too late on the fear of government angle, especially in the first world. right now corporations are the biggest threat and are taking on nations trying to protect their citizens. like tobacco companies sueing to forbid African nations from regulating them or even advertising about the harm of tobacco.
A rule of law? God help the nation with the means to enforce its laws. Also, few agree with the patriot act.
Abortion is murder.
Regulations and agencies to administer free market goods in a public setting is consolidating power. We have to look at the truth: whoever advocates more expansion advocates the more dangerous government.
OK who do u think really has the best chance winning right now? (personal feelings aside)
Republicans have no issue consolidating power. you are confusing them with liberitarians. Republicans love a police state with over powered police and patriot act style laws. they refuse to regulate companies, but what you put in your body and who you can marry is completely fair game to them.
Except he is running for the party that refuses to consolidate power. And his VP is as conservative as it gets.
I like Hillary. I think she'll be an excellent choice. Trump's strong man approach may sound nice to some but to me it reminds me of Soviet Union rulers like stalin and putin.
I prefer Trump but wish we had different canadites.
Hillary should win