The debate "Hillary should be in jail" was started by
August 29, 2016, 6:54 pm.
24 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 16 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
dalton7532 posted 1 argument, blakelovesjesus posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
PsychDave posted 2 arguments, Nemiroff posted 2 arguments, historybuff posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
blakelovesjesus, dalton7532, NotoriousBishop, north, Bodaciouslady16, thereal, fadi, Bman192837465, sabrina, BBQonions, TheDebator9000, neveralone and 12 visitors agree.
PsychDave, Nemiroff, historybuff, armygirl44, scrumnug and 11 visitors disagree.
What help do you actually think she should have given?
1) she wasn't in charge of staffing a specific embassy. she was a top diplomat flying to war zones trying to negotiate peace or multinational trade deals.
2) bad staffing decisions don't get you imprisoned. they get you fired. (those decisions were not her responsibility, but even if they were your reaction is still biased). the people who go to jail are the ones who ACTUALLY COMMIT THE MURDER.
your views on appropriate punishment seem to be defined by whether or nor you agree with the accused. lol.
she wasn't in charge of security. it is in no way her fault. how is this complicated for you?
The fact that she had an opportunity to provide help and she ignored is bad in and of itself, we would imprison her for a bad staffing decision because she gave a lack of response which caused those men their lives
why would the top DIPLOMAT be in charge of security details in specific embassies?
and since when do we jail people for bad staffing decisions?
she was not in charge of security. she was not responsible for it.
Well when you should be convicted of a crime for getting 4 men killed, and lieing I don't think your a worth candidate
She has not been convicted of a crime. Until she has, she should not be in jail.
But she lied to the FBI
I'm saying that you could accuse alot of people of being negligent. being criminally negligent is a different thing.
I think she's not much different than any other politician. she is likely corrupt. she probably lied. but unfortunately the option to support bernie has been removed. trump is definitely corrupt and lies constantly.
proving that she broke the law when the other officials who did the same thing did not would be impossible.
Would you say she was not at all negligent; that she spoken the whole truth, and nothing but the truth to the FBI? For complaining about corruption, you certainly ignore the cronyism of our leaders. Do you think someone else in that situation would have gone to trial?
it was investigated. there was no grounds to charge her with anything. get over it.
I have heard many prosecuters say that Comey layed out a perfect case for an indictment and punishment of some sort. It was one after another and Hillary Clinton's trail of lies continue to appear on the subject. Just recently, she tried to state that she used the private server because Powell told her about his experiences. However, it should be noted Hillary Clinton was using a private server as Secretary of State for a year now, and it was decietful enought that Powell had to correct the record. Lying is proof of intent and she has done alot of that on that subject. Why the hell did she lie so much on the subject if she did nothing wrong and knew it wasn't criminal?