History is not necessary what really happened

February 7, 2014, 3:21 am

Agree24 Disagree13


The debate "History is not necessary what really happened" was started by The_writer on February 7, 2014, 3:21 am. 24 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 13 people are on the disagree side. That might be enough to see the common perception. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

Josh posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
echofrommadiun posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.

The_writer, tkershaw3, suchadahl, Josh, LC_CU_Cat_Catt, TheDentedHelmet, Disasterology, Bailz, MerciPol, CodeGonzalez, sonaybitch and 13 visitors agree.
echofrommadiun, Amirah_Husna, Vigilante, Tactial_Mind, andrej, BabyT14, WordSpeller and 6 visitors disagree.

History is called his-story for a reason

5 years, 6 months ago

History is really necessary for us not only old but also young generation. History shows the identity and evidence of a country like authentication of letters or statues. By knowing the history, we actually know the whole story in the past. Keeping our country’s history is one of actions for loving our own country.

5 years, 7 months ago
Discuss "History is not necessary what really happened" history
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.