The debate "Hitler was pretty decent at art" was started by
February 18, 2017, 11:06 am.
27 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 6 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
thereal posted 1 argument, Jona posted 1 argument, SalonY posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Your_dad, thereal, MrShine, Jona, Yanksxx21, UnderdogMike, makson, SalonY, Namra_ta, DiabolikIzzy, thecommunistmanifesto, anu1302 and 15 visitors agree.
Neo_Nazi, Ematio, human and 3 visitors disagree.
He was a Good Artist For Sure...
he didn't make the sawastika. It was originally a symbol of peace which he ruined.... it was on a Pokemon card but they had to remove it for obvious reasons
He was decent at the art of deception.
Correct if I am wrong, earlier he was an art student later his paintings were refused by a Jew. And as far as I remember this was told to me by my teacher. Apart from this his painting are good.
Its the Hindu symbol for peace.
the swastika was an old pagan symbol. as is the reverse swastika. they both predate not only hitler, but Christian Europe as a whole.
Indeed he did.
I looked up some paintings he did. he had some talent.
daddy, The only artwork of hitler which i did like was the design of the swastika.