The debate "I agree with you to disagree with me if and only if you agree with me to disagree with me" was started by
January 7, 2016, 9:40 pm.
13 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 5 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
MrShine posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
AngryBlogger, franciscotrejo, omactivate, Carlos and 9 visitors agree.
MrShine, ReadyToBegin, TheControversy, DarkDerpy and 1 visitor disagree.
Yes, I agree MrShine.
I agree with your right to disagree with me
you agree jointly with me to disagree with myself . . .
That's what I got there. . .
wait **** got the last part now
you agree to disagree with me
therefore, by disagreeing . . .
they do not agree with their right to agree and are a hypocrite.
Nope. I think I failed.
Holy smokes... this is above me. I am not getting it... nor am I getting what MrShine is saying. Haha.
we can agree to agree, agree to disagree, but disagreeing on agreeing to disagree should we say circumstances can change. Basically the and only in the original argument is the only reason to not agree, it was in spite of actual agreement or agreement on disagreement. Just disagreeing happens to, though sometimes both sides don't like disagreeing. Agree?