The debate "If men can be shirtless then woman can be shirtless its only fair to have the choice to" was started by
November 5, 2017, 3:22 pm.
57 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 30 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
historybuff posted 3 arguments, blue_rayy posted 3 arguments, YoungVoicesof_Tomorrow posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
ThePhilosopher posted 1 argument, dalton7532 posted 2 arguments to the disagreers part.
YoungVoicesof_Tomorrow, historybuff, SirIntegra, Nemiroff, blue_rayy, Tabu, AntiTHEIST, sological, nate, rodney, fishermo20, afterlife27, Masonearl, judas, Against_eu, anu1302, BrynnY, kissmyashleeyy, trump and 38 visitors agree.
ThePhilosopher, NJ150, mustufa, soccer19, dalton7532, viralbeats, blakekelly116, bernie2020 and 22 visitors disagree.
Back in the days, showing a bit of leg was too sexy. Now it is just whatever. If woman were topless, eventually they will just look like naked tribe people. The boobies will lose its sex appeal when exposed too often. No air of mystery equals no sexiness.
And they should be executed why? Because you believe it is wrong or sinful?
I see what you are saying. However, people rape because they feel the need for pleasure. Legalizing rape won't stop or slow down rape, as people still feel the need for pleasure. People won't stop robbing banks if it were legal, because they would still need money. Is this where you were going?
well i think its due to human psychology that people tend to do illegal things when they are laws against it. If there are pro laws , I think lesser people would break the law
Thank you for your answer buff, and I don't understand what you mean blue_ray?
The more we become conservative and restrictive, the more people would try to break the laws.
Relate my comment to this thread. : P
well that's a fairly broad list. I would say, if men can be shirtless so can women. this is the law in Canada, you don't see many topless women walking around.
at a certain point we have to draw a line on how much we want people to show in our society. it is perfectly acceptable for society to say the top half is ok but the bottom half isn't. maybe in the future being naked will lose it's stigma entirely.
if society decided that full nudity was permissible, presumably those laws would need to be reevaluated.
it stops where we as a society decide to stop. as long as things remain equal between genders I don't see any issue with reevaluating our social stigmas.
If men can be shirtless, why can't women be shirtless? If they top half of your body can be naked, why can't the bottom half? Why do younger people have to be clothed, if older people have the option to not wear any? If young males and females are allowed to see this in public, why would it be bad if an adult sends full body pictures to a minor? Where does it stop and why? Just curious of others opinions, I am not making a point.
such women should be publicly executed.
Violence and Harassment are present at high levels today, every 98 seconds someone is being harrassed. This happens due to mental conflicta and insecurity in the harasser, if we learn to love ourselfs (in moderation, not complete narcs) then maybe this could go down, if people are comfortable with bodies ans realize everyone is different, maybe the world could be better in teems of socialization, maybe, but i could be wrong
But no one specified Canada, and it's a good step toward gender equality
Canada has alot to be proud of.
and sending photo of your junk to a minor and walking topless are not the same thing. I know you are completely delusional and asking you to make sense is like trying to explain the laws of thermodynamics to an eggplant, but at least try to actually talk about the topic.
I guess Historybuff's proud of Canada
encouraging nudity in subtle ways is a banner of homosexual sodomite rule.
You see there are nude beaches, and there are orgies that take place. Naked people in public is just a bad idea like Anthony Weiner sending everyone except Mrs. Wiener a picture of his penis.
way to contribute absolutely nothing to the topic najam.
A homosexual sodomite would force everyone to live naked in a prison if they could. Less guns and less clothes is the only way they are able to continue the murders and rapes in the jails.
in Canada they can.