The debate "If no ban on guns then how to achieve peace in US" was started by
April 15, 2016, 9:05 am.
6 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 6 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
There is a tie in this debate, post your arguments, call some reinforcements and break this tie.
jamesbond007 posted 2 arguments, RyanWakefield posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
blanco posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
jamesbond007, RyanWakefield, amzar and 3 visitors agree.
lets_hear_your_argument, ProudAmerican888, JakobBoghora and 3 visitors disagree.
Ryan, people got killed before guns. lol. think a little bit
The right to bear arms is apart of our Constitution, sure something's should be dismissed from the constitution, but our right to protect ourselves, No FUCKING WAY! Outlaws have no regards for the law that's why they call them outlaws. If anything they should make a more strict violent rule against criminals, so they may fear to commit crimes. The law should be feared to establish some sort of comfort, but peace I don't think can ever be established on account of our nature to do wrong.
If I want to murder somebody bad enough I'll do it by any means necessary
give nobody a gun and nobody gets killed
give evrybody a Gun 1 gun vs 20? just saying
To answer your question JB the answer is simple $
2015 did have a rise bust you must account for 3 terrorist attacks that were in the name of ISIS
actually you'll see a drop until recent years.
you're assuming that the state is an effective means of banning and restricting anything. weed and cocaine are banned in most places and yet to this day it can easily be bought and sold on the streets and even in many cases on the internet. all the ban on drugs has done is keep drugs out of the hands of people who probably wouldn't have bought them to begin with. the best way to handle the violent crime rate is to make it easier for good people to defend themselves. also look up the fbi statistics for the last 20 years and you will see a rise in the violent crime rates in correspondence with the rise in gun control. or even the past 8 year rise in violent crime in correspondence with the Obama presidency.
Mine doesn't order it like that lol I apologize
I was referring to Alex's comment, hence why it says that I replied to him
No, don't think you understand what I'm saying by assuming. I'm saying strict gun control doesn't stop murder.
you are assuming the criminal had a gun in the first place, which would be very difficult with strict gun control.
And the difference between britain is .0004%. it's easy to say oh the US had 10,000 murders in a year then look at other countries (like the 2 you posted) and see 600 and wonder the gap. The gap is the total # of people we will have more crime here and more issues because we have am exponential amount of more people.
there is only a .0003% difference of murders between the United States and Canada as well.
imagine a crimminal murder with a gun walking into a gun free zone. is he going to obey that sign? nope. he doesn't obey rules cause He is a criminal. a while ago the US banned alchol. what followed? the biggest crime ever, with people smuggling from Mexico, and making their own.
There was a guy in Britain that ate a woman alive. Would you consider that peaceful?
then how to achieve peace like canada or britian?
I'm being facetious. Banning guns doesn't necessarily make peace.
how to stop murders?
Just ban murder that should help