The debate "Imagine that an aborted child could speak to his mother today what would he tell her" was started by
March 31, 2016, 10:00 am.
15 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 11 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
fadi posted 7 arguments, Sanjana posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Pugsly posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
djchivers, fadi, Sanjana, shinam27 and 11 visitors agree.
supercat, RyanWakefield, Pugsly, cancer_wins and 7 visitors disagree.
Your opinion is crystal clear, the problem with it is that it is just your opinion. You haven't given any argument or logic to support it. A drop of blood has human DNA, by your original criteria that makes it human. You need to do more than just shout your opinion over and over. You need to argue why it is valid. Saying it is means that all we would need to do is say it isn't to counter you. We have done better than that and pointed out flaws in your belief, which prompted you to qualify your argument further, still without supporting it.
Is a miscarriage murder or suicide? Should women who experience one be investigated as people are in suspicious deaths?
Do you feel that women should be given the choice of either dying due to an unsafe pregnancy or spending years in jail? That is the logical extension of abortions being premeditated murder.
I think our point is also clear. a fetus is not a person. it might be at some point. but until you reach a critical stage in development it is not yet a person. therefore aborting it cannot be murder, by definition.
oh god this argument is getting stupid i think that my idea is crystal clear if a human cell with human dna that has the potential to become a child is killed intentionally it is murder because you are ending the future of a person to be
Blood on a Kleenex from a bloody nose has human DNA. Is it alive?
"Thanks for not bringing me into a life of misery" or alternatively "...." as fetuses don't possess the ability of language.
yes it doea they have human dna
"wassup mom "
it would say, I love you mom but what sin have I committed.
They would say nothing, they would know nothing, and they would think about nothing.
They can't feel, think, see, hear, smell, and taste.
If anything almost every one that's not in the medical field wouldn't be able to identify it.
then you just said that your whole argument is pointless. people with Gene disorders are still human. therefore trying to use the number of chromosomes to indicate human life doesn't make any sense.
they are humans but not normal
oh mom, I still can't imagine that I am aborted. I was so happy in your womb. Your sweet voice was like honey to my ears and I was waiting for the day to come to the world and look into your eyes. I loved you so much and I knew that you and dad loved me more. When I heard that you are aborting me, I strongly believed that there was something really bad that might happen which would hurt me or you if I was born. I understand that you deeply regret it too mommy! Please don't cry as it hurts me more. Convey my love to my future siblings. oh mom, I still can't imagine that I'm aborted. Your sweet voice would linger in my ears forever! Love you mommy!
Again you are claiming that people with Down syndrome are not human.
well yes if you have more or less you will no more be a human
you are not sleeping right?
So is an embryo that doesn't implant going to be condemned to hell for committing suicide?
you mean 46
the definition of a human isn't something with 48 chromosomes
no the difference between an egg and the first cell that forms from the fusion of an egg and a sperm is that an egg has 23 chromosomes but
the first cell of the human body has 46 chromosomes
it might, it might not. and an egg might eventually become a fetus. that means that women are killing someone every month. what would those eggs say if they could speak to their mother? your question is irrelevant.
it will eventually become a child that can think
well no it is not biased to say what i think
the topic was designed to force an emotional response. the question is biased. it's like vegans asking what would a cow say after making hamburger out of it. it is an absurd question with no value.
oh man. the topic says IMAGINE IF....
it would say nothing because it's a foetus and cannot think or feel pain
the aborted child would have said " why did you abort me? give me a chance. i wanted to see the world mommy. i would be glad to see you mommy and even daddy. but there might be some reason to abort me. i am sad mommy."