The debate "In order to save the Iraqisland troops from other country must be send" was started by
May 8, 2015, 6:10 pm.
4 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 17 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
PsychDave posted 1 argument, Sosocratese posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
AnkGanu, queenmar497, action007man and 1 visitor agree.
PsychDave, Sosocratese, Violet, Benzdick, soullesschicken, sdiop, Trance, musejay1 and 9 visitors disagree.
I agree with Dave on this one. Also, bringing in foreign troops props up one religious group over an other simply because they work better with the Americans. This creates more hostility between the various sects in the long run.
The Middle East is in desperate need of a reformation, and foreign influences prevent that reformation from actually taking place. Countries in that area, Iran, Saudi, Jordan, etc... should be the only foreign powers involved since they don't carry the title of infidel which serves as a uniting "bad guy" for the various Islamic sects. Having western powers invade only serves to strengthen fundamentalist sects.
The problem is one of perception. If American troops are sent, it stops being religious fanatics fighting the Iraqi military and becomes, in the eyes of many people, Iraqi people versus American invaders. This would provide a rallying cry for the fanatics. Providing aid, logistics and other support would help, but boots on the ground would stir up resentment based on the history of the region and their past interactions with the US.