The debate "Ironman is better than Batman." was started by
June 20, 2018, 5:49 am.
18 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 7 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Notanidiot posted 8 arguments to the agreers part.
Notanidiot, historybuff, RealCaffNasty, Andji, DRJ and 13 visitors agree.
mlowe and 6 visitors disagree.
so essentially time is key
Yea, Batman would need a week tops.
It's a suit bud, he can move in it. It's just made out of the same material as Thor's hammer. I don't think it has the exact same properties as Thor's hammer. Thor's hammer requires someone who is worthy. Might be a spell or magic involved with the hammer. (Asgard does have magic btw. Magic and science are one there.)
I think iron man wins with 3 days
give batman half a year and he'll sleep walk though it tho
how can he move in it? or does it not have the same properties as Thor's hammer?
Its made out of the same material as Thor's hammer. It can make him time travel and manipulate time. It can definitely take a hit by Batman in the justice buster any day. Batman made his suit specifically for defeating the justice league which is why he'd lose. The justice league has basically no armor and clear weaknesses so it was quite "easy" for Batman to defeat them. All he needed was the right materials. But no material will protect you from a person in a suit that can time travel and is made of literal God materials.
I don't think so... I believe batman won that fight. albiet Superman wasn't trying to fight. idk this suit sounds outrageously overpowered. it literally has sun's in it's fist. what's ironmans suit have?
Wasn't the justice buster suit destroyed by Superman? If so, I don't think Batman could create another one in 3 days. I also doubt Batman could win against Ironmans uru armor. Pretty much created by God's themselves.
batman knows how to overkill.haha. idk how u contain a sun but that's great. gg Ironman u dead. rip.haha
the justice buster. it'll put the hulk buster and the nano suit to shame.
that's why I hate DC. overpowered (and silly) heros vs usually weak villians. i guess that's a symptom of the golden age.
batman is the only not overpowered main DC hero, but he needs to keep up with beings that beat up gods, so they gave him the proper tools.
hes got freaking miniaturized stars in his fists! wtf does that even mean?
batman probably has access to vibranium. he's rich too and a "good" guy. he made a suit for Superman I'm sure he can make one for Ironman.
This cite has said it was indeed emp proof. I think killmonger (don't know if that's how you spell it) would've used an emp based attack to kill the black panther. According to the movies only vibranium can have any sort of affect on vibranium. So yes, Tony's vibranium suit is emp proof.
emps fries the system. once an object is hit with one u may as well throw it away.
Ironman really doesn't have loved ones and the ones he does have Batman can now use against him if he wanted. what's the use of giving up ur identity? put everyone around u in danger? the people Batman lost wasn't because of his secret identity but circumstances. idk on emp proof but I've never heard it said so.
Can't he create a suit that is emp proof or at least has back up power for those just in case moments?
He has suits at his disposal. He could use all of them at once. Not saying Batman isn't a great hero but compared to Ironman he isn't all that super. Tony told the world his identity, never lost a loved one. Batman didn't tell anyone his identity, people his loved ones died. See what I mean? Also Ironman has a suit of vibranium. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think it's emp proof. The only way to get vibranium is in Wakanda, and they're friends with Tony Stark.
Ironman relies on his suit. a simple emp or the like could take him down.
batman should not win half the fights he wins. iron man's tech is his weakness. disable the suit, and hes pretty weak. they both have intellect, but batman has way more actual combat experience. also psychological warfare (I don't think stark is that strong there).
I'm not sure what 3 days means for these men, but the more time batman has, the better chance that he will win.
also I think stark lost to cap eventually (good fight tho). got caps shield slammed into his shiny heart thing. hes good, but yes got his limits. also batman's psychological warfare may make stark's computer go crazy lol. and predicting the bat is not as easy as a straight forward guy like cap. that may hurt stark more then help as batman intentionally lays a pattern as a trap.
That's just it, he needs time to prepare. He knows his enemies and friends. He knows their weaknesses. He doesn't know Ironman though. Ironman has barely any weaknesses. He relies on his intellect and quick thinking. Batman relies on brute strength almost always. Not to mention Ironman has an ai that can recognize fight patterns. How do you think he won against Captain America, a literal super soldier?
Batman prepared for everything. he literally has a plan to contain/kill all hero's and villians alike if nessary so...
Very true but who do you think would win in a fight? They each have let's say 3 days to prepare. Nobody else involved.
marvel is better than DC in general. and I'm not just talking about movies.
batman is pretty badass tho