The debate "Is animal testing justified" was started by
August 14, 2018, 1:12 pm.
By the way, SaffronSHAM3 is disagreeing with this statement.
38 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 44 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most people are against to this statement.
SaffronSHAM3 posted 1 argument, AGustafson posted 1 argument, diecinueve posted 2 arguments to the agreers part.
SaffronSHAM3 posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
sabrina, ototoxic, Kim, AGustafson, TheNewHuman, chanchal123, TD, diecinueve, Allirix and 29 visitors agree.
WhiteCaller, SaffronSHAM3, bae_jil_dong, Lolster46, MrLibertarian, Aniket12345, Crystals, crazybirdlady, wth64828, Daisythecat, Jemjem13, Entropyrose and 32 visitors disagree.
You wouldn't shoot a lion charging at someone you love to save their life?
Medications save the lives of many people. It would be the life of one animal for thousands of people. Do you still prefer the animal's life?
The animal. One's life should not be sacrificed for one human.
Would you rather save the life of an animal than that of a person?
yes, even if it can save a life, but don't know if the animal will be hurt during the test then I am against it.
even if they are testing life saving medications?
If you cant guarantee that it won't hurt the animal then no.
If it is not going to hurt them in any way (mentally included)
In that case u support animal dissection and vivisection
This question doesn't have a straightforward answer. If the testing is for commercial products like makeup, then no, but if it is for science and medicine then yes. As long as the testing is meant for the benefit of humanity as a whole, then yes.
It depends if it is for mecdical reaseach,then yes as it will save more animal life(humans are also animals)then what it took away but i do not see the need to test commercial products on animals.
I have no clue on this one and want to learn more about others perspectives on this one