The debate "Is it murder if no one thinks it's murder" was started by
October 9, 2019, 5:13 am.
14 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 8 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
TheExistentialist posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Allirix, TheExistentialist, Shrivali_16, haphil1992, Agrumentman, tyler0300 and 8 visitors agree.
dinosaurrawr, YEET and 6 visitors disagree.
if you're asking if it's wrong if no one thinks it's wrong then no to those particular people in the set of rules that they follow for determine what's what's right and wrong whether that is moral or immoral according to a moral landscape run by agreement of human well-being is totally separate from that and murder is murder is Murder By definition it doesn't matter if you don't think it's murder if it disagrees with well-being in a secular moral system but not to them
I agree with you that 99.9% of the time you would be correct. But jury nullification is a real thing. Juries can rule that someone is not guilty if they feel the law is unjust. So it is possible for the popularity of a law to be relevant. If the jury says they are not guilty, then legally they did not commit a murder even if they did kill the person.
Murder, by definition is unlawful. Therefore, it is independent of opinion and only subject to interpretation in accordance to the law. Murder is also dependent on the laws of a given municipality and even time. So an act may be considered murder in one part of the world but not another; an act may be considered murder at one point in time and "not-murder" at another point in time. When defining an act as murder or "not-murder" the only consideration is legality not opinion.