Is nasa trustworthy

March 1, 2017, 2:05 am

Agree14 Disagree10

58%
42%

The debate "Is nasa trustworthy" was started by Ematio on March 1, 2017, 2:05 am. By the way, Ematio is disagreeing with this statement. 14 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 10 people are on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

Blu_Ray posted 11 arguments, TheExistentialist posted 2 arguments, PsychDave posted 6 arguments to the agreers part.
UnderdogMike posted 7 arguments, Ematio posted 13 arguments to the disagreers part.

Blu_Ray, TheExistentialist, redstar, sabrina, PsychDave, Yanksxx21, Diogenes_of_Sinope and 7 visitors agree.
Ematio, UnderdogMike, Najam1, Nemiroff, human and 5 visitors disagree.

PsychDave
replied to...

No worries. The debate can wait. Have a good night and a safe flight.

2 years, 1 month ago
PsychDave
replied to...

If you want another analysis of the radiation dose and how it was managed, here is another.

http://www.braeunig.us/apollo/VABraddose.htm

2 years, 1 month ago
UnderdogMike
replied to...

dude, I'm in bed. lol. maybe next week I'll have more time. got a plane in 8 hours.

2 years, 1 month ago
PsychDave
replied to...

Do you see the problem with ignoring evidence simply because it conflicts with your opinion?

If you don't like the evidence, do some research and post what you find. How much radiation would the astronauts be exposed to, and how much would be lethal? If people have proven it would be lethal, it shouldn't be hard to provide that proof.

2 years, 1 month ago
UnderdogMike
replied to...

oh... NASA math.

do you see no problem in blindly accepting everything a GOVERNMENT RUN institution tells you?

2 years, 1 month ago
PsychDave
replied to...

Have you actually done the math for how much radiation they would actually have been exposed to, or did you just trust other people who claimed it would be lethal?

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov/earth/3Page7.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwjWhdORrLfSAhXly4MKHcV8AtcQFggyMAI&usg=AFQjCNFg5rSdL6l_L1ezB4DfoLYi5Gdb9A&sig2=zZ3VgkZKJf7oeBq1uCyfMQ

2 years, 1 month ago
UnderdogMike
replied to...

the capsules were not lined either.

please try not to be so obtuse.

2 years, 1 month ago
Nemiroff
replied to...

would they ride out most of the trip in a "lander"? I'm pretty sure that was just for the "lunar landing" and the moon doesn't have radiation belts of any significance. if at all.

2 years, 1 month ago
Ematio
replied to...

I think he means the people inside of it would be dead or at least horribly irradiated

2 years, 1 month ago
Nemiroff
replied to...

"quick question : if NASA says that the van allen belts will kill anything and anyone flying through them if they don't have at least a quarter inch of lead shielding...

and NASA says the moon landers had zero lead shielding...

who do you believe, NASA or NASA?"

I'm confused by this comment. are the lunar landers alive? did anyone say that the Allen belts will destroy all equipment that isn't protected by thick lead?

I don't see any part of this that is contradictory. if you feel you are in the right, using such weak, illogical arguments will only hurt your case.

2 years, 1 month ago
PsychDave
replied to...

I'm curious, do you believe all of the space program is fake? I ask because there are satellites in orbit, so how would they get there if it is fake?

2 years, 1 month ago
PsychDave
replied to...

I would say the easiest thing is to make wild accusations with absolutely no proof and claim that any proof must be fake because it disagrees with you.

2 years, 1 month ago
UnderdogMike
replied to...

what is easier to pull off, faking a space program, or faking a person's history on the internet?

come on.

2 years, 1 month ago
PsychDave
replied to...

It should be easy for you to prove the snopes article wrong. Simply explain how there are records of the people who are supposedly the astronauts having different lives and Jone's before the accident. One was a former air force pilot in training with NASA, while apparently also the CEO of a company. Just explain how he could simultaneously do both.

2 years, 1 month ago
TheExistentialist
replied to...

sure, but that nonsense source you provided has absolutely no credibility.

The source you provided is widely discredited. Dr. Eowyn who is the main author of this page is actually maria hsia chang. So you provided a source with zero reputation by an author who uses a fake name (which is not information provided on the website) and then try to say snopes is not credible. Talk about double standards.

The burden of proof also lies with you as we all know "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

2 years, 1 month ago

Snopes isn't always right

2 years, 1 month ago

Snopes completely went past the fact that the guys who claim to be twin brothers are recorded to be single births

2 years, 1 month ago

quick question : if NASA says that the van allen belts will kill anything and anyone flying through them if they don't have at least a quarter inch of lead shielding...

and NASA says the moon landers had zero lead shielding...

who do you believe, NASA or NASA?

2 years, 1 month ago
Blu_Ray
replied to...

are you from US?

2 years, 1 month ago

snopes... lol

2 years, 1 month ago
TheExistentialist
replied to...

@ematio
you should really do more research before posting this nonsense. It took literally 20 seconds to fact check the article you posted

http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/challenger.asp

2 years, 1 month ago
Blu_Ray
replied to...

got it. unbelievable. But the truth is, iam one of them.

2 years, 1 month ago

https://www.google.com/amp/s/fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/04/30/are-the-crew-members-of-1986-space-shuttle-challenger-still-alive/amp/

2 years, 1 month ago
Blu_Ray
replied to...

wait. can you provide me a link?

2 years, 1 month ago

Some of the survivors are still using their real names, and 2 of them claim that they're identical twins, even though their birth record states they were single births

2 years, 1 month ago
Blu_Ray
replied to...

wait a minute checking the net

2 years, 1 month ago

Just look it up

2 years, 1 month ago
Blu_Ray
replied to...

evidence?

2 years, 1 month ago
Blu_Ray
replied to...

how?

2 years, 1 month ago

Look it up

2 years, 1 month ago

They're alive

2 years, 1 month ago
Blu_Ray
replied to...

yes. why? they all died in an accident

2 years, 1 month ago

Yes. Do you know who the challenger crew were?

2 years, 1 month ago
Blu_Ray
replied to...

Dont you know about curiosity?

2 years, 1 month ago

Of what?

2 years, 1 month ago
Blu_Ray
replied to...

We have footages and evidences

2 years, 1 month ago

Like how do you know they're not lying?

2 years, 1 month ago
Blu_Ray
replied to...

what type of queations?

2 years, 1 month ago
Ematio
replied to...

Or do you just take their word for it?

2 years, 1 month ago

Okay, do you ever question NASA?

2 years, 1 month ago

NASA has sent people to moon. It has satellites. People are on ISS. We have all sorts of information on mars. It has collaborated with RSC ( russian nasa) to know more about space and a joint effort reduces the cost. So isnt nasa trust worthy? you decide

2 years, 1 month ago

nope

2 years, 1 month ago
Discuss "Is nasa trustworthy" politics science technology
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.