The debate "Is religion needed in the world" was started by
August 29, 2015, 5:26 pm.
68 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 50 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Sooraj posted 1 argument, invincible_01 posted 1 argument, Spring posted 1 argument, Maharshi posted 1 argument, Lane posted 1 argument, omactivate posted 1 argument, pajrc1234 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
sloanstar1000 posted 2 arguments, Sosocratese posted 1 argument, historybuff posted 1 argument, eaqyyy posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
thetruthhasbeenspoken, Sooraj, sabrina, historybuff, invincible_01, stantinou93, Spring, jbailee, Jlav0820, gouthamabi, Bluevelvet, djuanstewart, Moo1, Maharshi, libelulle, Muskan, ReedSchneider, Bestforevr, dotdotdot, Lane, Neaa, Cross, Ryan, pajrc1234, steady_current, omactivate, AstroSpace, true_debate_life, wmd, Pikachu, stevenchen and 37 visitors agree.
sloanstar1000, DeliriousMadam, Sosocratese, DanielleR123, shobhit, eaqyyy, mvaris, rebecca14, Bodaciouslady16, rajarshimaiti, TruthSeekerCivilSpeaker, Marvelgirl2002, countrybumpkin, keshav_garg, sidhant, wayneSPEC, Hellrazor, Katana_MC, athinus, relarishabh, Yuki_Amayane, WaspToxin, srishti_pinkleaves and 27 visitors disagree.
Actually, there's a reason to keep crime free without afterlife. Humans have evolved to work better when we have peace among each other. The war comes in when people have different ideas of peace, but that's irrelevant. People usually don't hurt others when they know how it feels to get hurt. That's called empathy.
as much as I hate religion, it's what puts us in a social group that can team up in life. It's an evolutionary mechanism that helps us stay alive
National law and religious law are both a way to keep people in line. But they do it in different ways. While national law helps to enable people to live in communities, religious law is more individualized, often holding people to a higher moral standard, which is usually very hard to reach. That being said, non-religious people are NOT unstable, immoral people. They often live by similar standards set by themselves and their values. Religion also provides hope to people in bad situations. For example, homeless people often carry a very strong faith with them. The most mainstream religions offer some kind of ultimate reward at the end, such as heaven in Christianity. People who are suffering, whether its emotionally, financially, physically, or anything else, have something to look forward to after life. In this sense, the high moral standard religion supports and the hope it gives followers is necessary, especially in a world where there's so much suffering and so much misconduct. As a side note, religion is a belief system and should not be used to section oneself or others off from people of other religions. This is what leads to problems between people of other religions, and what might form many people's opinions that the world should be rid of religion.
There shud be only one religion that is HUMANITY.
thats where constitution/national regulation comes into place, because religion is something related vertically to god, while the national regulation is something established directly for the people in the country. lots of cases proven that even ppl with religion can still done violence towards other
Not to mention the extremely religious countries tend to be rife with corruption and totalitarian suppression of Rights.
More secular countries have statistically less crime. More theological countries have statistically more crime. So it could be argued that the relationship between crime and religion is actually a positive correlation. I don't think that's the argument I would make, but at the very least, the argument that religion somehow causes crime to be lower is not supported by any study. It's simply not true.
Law is also a deterrent for crime. But people do not commit crime because they scare of the aftermath and punishment of violating the law. Some religions could purify people's minds through their doctrines, leading them to do the right things by their own views.
invincible, we know that's not true though, the least religious countries on the planet just happen to be the most peaceful and non-violent. I seriously doubt that's a coincidence
imagine if there's no religions or beliefs. people will do anything they want(including killing, rape, etc.) without any consideration of what they might get in the afterlife as the payback/punishment.
now, whether the payback or even the existence of afterlife is true or not, it can prevent human being from doing something harmful towards other. which basically all religion condemned such harmful actions.
its just a name for looting people by corrapting their minds by fear of god
define religion, I think this is actually a good point