The debate "Is there really any evidence that the Syrian Assad even used chemical attacks on his own people" was started by
April 15, 2018, 3:19 am.
15 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 8 people are on the disagree side.
People are starting to choose their side.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
Matthew354 posted 1 argument, Nemiroff posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
Slymcfly posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Nemiroff, LiberalsAversion, chickboy1776 and 12 visitors agree.
Slymcfly and 7 visitors disagree.
sounds like fake news cause every other source is saying that the inspectors are still being prevented from entering the location.
I just discovered something that One America News network has reported: there wasn't even any chemical attacks. As it turns out, the people that were sent to the hospital and allegedly were attacked by chemicals show no sign of their bodies containing deadly chemicals.
It mostly likely some punk in Syria that wanted the US to make an attack with missiles with fabricated news, this is the danger of fake news ladies and gentlemen.
Nemiroff, I actually agree with you on this one. if Assad hadn't been responsible for the attack, we would have seen him all over the news denying his involvement. He likely couldn't go on live TV, but he could have easily sent out a tape recording that shows his denial.
it was determined he did in the past, and pretty sure he acknowledged it and had to destroy what was supposedly all of it.
do you believe this was faked?