The debate "It is always more difficult to fight against faith than against knowledge" was started by
May 28, 2015, 6:39 am.
36 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 10 people are on the disagree side.
That might be enough to see the common perception.
It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.
desght posted 1 argument to the agreers part.
DerpedLocke posted 1 argument to the disagreers part.
Aswathi, DarkAngelAnarchist, Sosocratese, PsychDave, WordSpeller, toughgamerjerry, Damn3d, soullesschicken, sdiop, historybuff, sabrina, Skeetc15, desght, Jlav0820, wmd, invincible_01, benrpollak, Musstta, kittrapper, countrybumpkin and 16 visitors agree.
KimUri, DerpedLocke, aceofhearts, pajrc1234 and 6 visitors disagree.
That's to someone who values knowledge over faith. But in those cases they usually don't use faith as an argument in the first place.
Perhaps... but only if your audience believes faith is a legitimate and logical framework (is that the correct word?) for believing in something. "I have faith that x exists" is oftentimes less convincing than "I have proof that x exists".