It's evil to punish a soul for eternity for actions of limited consequences

May 4, 2019, 11:50 am

Agree27 Disagree17

61%
39%

The debate "It's evil to punish a soul for eternity for actions of limited consequences" was started by VedicPresupp on May 4, 2019, 11:50 am. 27 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 17 people are on the disagree side. That might be enough to see the common perception. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

mtbtheboss posted 1 argument, RoyDierlijk posted 1 argument, JDAWG9693 posted 1 argument to the agreers part.


VedicPresupp, Nemiroff, JDAWG9693, freakofnaturespitbucket, MADHURA, killer, amir_alhakim07, maksonmakson, mwest0097, mtbtheboss, codyray16 and 16 visitors agree.
LucyTheDebatorQueen, lukeluckynuke123, RoyDierlijk, Jane and 13 visitors disagree.

JDAWG9693
replied to...

"You cant call a judge wrong because he's a judge"

That's your logic

1 month, 2 weeks ago

you cant really call the author of morality immoral if he does as he pleases, because ultimately God can say what is wrong and right, nobody has a say in it, thats what objective morality is.

either way, i don't believe in hell, but if there is, im not the judge, God is.

1 month, 2 weeks ago

you are telling me that it's completely fair that Hitler, Stalin, the Nazis, and Ivan the Terrible to get the same punishment as a good man who happened to be married to a man.. yea no. there's no crime ever that could be justified in an eternity of torture, and if you honestly believe that you are either heavily indoctrinated and fearful or you are a f***ing physco.

1 month, 2 weeks ago
Discuss "It's evil to punish a soul for eternity for actions of limited consequences" religion
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.