Just because something is disturbing or sexual does not mean it's 'art'

May 16, 2014, 7:52 am

Agree11 Disagree0

100%
0%

The debate "Just because something is disturbing or sexual does not mean it's 'art'" was started by tkershaw3 on May 16, 2014, 7:52 am. 11 people are on the agree side of this discussion, while 0 person is on the disagree side. People are starting to choose their side. It looks like most of the people in this community are on the agreeing side of this statement.

Nobody posted any argument under Just because something is disturbing or sexual does not mean it's 'art' yet. Be the first one to post an argument.

tkershaw3, wmd, alyssapeterson, aliot and 7 visitors agree.
Nobody disagrees.

Discuss "Just because something is disturbing or sexual does not mean it's 'art'" arts
Add an argument!
Use the arrow keys to navigate between statements. Press "A" to agree and press "D" to disagree.